TheseTruths
TheseTruths(@thesetruths)Offline
Wolf
June 12, 2026 01:50
This is the second incident I’ve seen like this lately, besides James O’Keefe’s report.
🚨 Los Angeles woman says she was OFFERED MONEY TO VOTE
They provided her a ballot, told her who to vote for and wanted her fill out the ballot with the information they gave her
“He pulled out his phone and he said, do you got nice penmanship? Well, yeah, why? Okay, here’s the… pic.twitter.com/h2QB3C6dx6
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 11, 2026
Los Angeles woman says she was OFFERED MONEY TO VOTE
They provided her a ballot, told her who to vote for and wanted her fill out the ballot with the information they gave her
“He pulled out his phone and he said, do you got nice penmanship? Well, yeah, why? Okay, here’s the to do is write this name on this form and then sign the signature and I’ll pay you — I said, I’m not doing that — He was trying to pay me to do voter fraud”
Democrats have a highly sophisticated worker of people who go out and pay people to vote Democrat
We need a federal audit of California’s election immediately
EXCERPT: “Colorado imposed a loyalty oath on lawyers as a condition of access to the state’s court system, pledging they would not assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Some federal agencies required defendants to accept gag orders as a condition of civil settlements, pledging they would not question the government’s case, no matter how weak they thought it.
These speech mandates, some going back more than 50 years, have come crashing down in recent weeks as The Centennial State opts against further cementing its reputation as a First Amendment flouter and the second Trump administration seeks to distinguish itself from its predecessors – including Trump I – as a paragon of prosecutorial propriety.
Buried in immigrant-protection legislation (HB 26-1276) signed into law last week is a provision that nixes SB 25-276’s requirement, only implemented two months ago, that lawyers swear “under penalty of perjury” they won’t use “nonpublic” information from the court system to help federal immigration enforcement.
The now-rescinded law had provoked outrage from some lawyers who faced the prompt when they tried to log in to the e-filing system, as well as legal scrutiny from watchdogs including Judicial Watch and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which told Just the News it had been “gearing up to sue” Colorado if it didn’t reverse course……”
VICTORY: Colorado repeals e-filing requirement that attorneys pledge not to assist federal immigration enforcement. Hopefully, Colorado’s HB 26-1276 marks the end of states attempting to lock access to the courts behind unconstitutional pledges. If not, FIRE remains ready to act. https://t.co/KW162G8THZpic.twitter.com/sUULBLbAl9
Just The News: “President Donald Trump on Thursday warned that the United States could not endure the consequences of birthright citizenship ahead of an expected Supreme Court decision on the matter.
“The United States of America cannot live with the shackles of Birthright Citizenship. It is not economically, or otherwise, sustainable, and no other Country in the World, of consequence, does it!” Trump posted on Truth Social.
The Supreme Court issued a series of opinions on Thursday morning, but did not release its highly anticipated ruling on Trump’s executive order directing federal agencies to interpret the 14th Amendment as not granting citizenship to the children of illegal aliens.
The administration has sought to eliminate the longstanding interpretation of the 14th Amendment so as to crack down on so-called birth tourism and “anchor babies.”
Though the Court has already heard oral arguments, it has yet to issue its opinion.”
this is a long article discussing the lack of judicial reprimanding. a married federal judge was having sex in her chambers with a cop and her staff knew about it. Furthermore, she often rubber stamped decisions made by clerks instead of writing her own. When it all came to light she was not impeached, she was told to write apology letters to the clerks addressing specifically her actions that were wrong. She wrote the letters basically saying I’m sorry you were mad type of thing. She still sits on the bench–protected by the upper echelons of the judicial system.
Huh….that’s a first. I saw a Momma or Poppa Robin hovering next to the jelly feeder gathering jelly, then dropping down to feed it to a fledgling Robin! Amazing!
Sew Colorful 
Good Morning All!
about 68* with hazy white clouds out there.
see what today brings…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good Morning, Pat!
Those puzzles are just too tricky this morning!! lol
Nice sunny day, finally. Good day to air out the house, since the pollen count is down after the rain.
Have a great day, take care. 🙏
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good Morning Gina!
we’ve got steady winds right now–rocking the hummer feeders from side to side.
I hope your day is great as well!
May God Bless!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Morning, Pat! Only 60 here this morning but clear skies and sunshine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Morning Filly!
any sign of Wheezer?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nope….
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 2 people
North Carolina should NOT be in that group!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think there should be empty spaces with the states’ names on them so people can see which states chose not to participate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I expect Trump will do something to highlight it.
LikeLike
TheseTruths
TheseTruths(@thesetruths)Offline
Wolf
June 12, 2026 01:50
This is the second incident I’ve seen like this lately, besides James O’Keefe’s report.
🚨 Los Angeles woman says she was OFFERED MONEY TO VOTE
They provided her a ballot, told her who to vote for and wanted her fill out the ballot with the information they gave her
“He pulled out his phone and he said, do you got nice penmanship? Well, yeah, why? Okay, here’s the… pic.twitter.com/h2QB3C6dx6
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 11, 2026
Los Angeles woman says she was OFFERED MONEY TO VOTE
They provided her a ballot, told her who to vote for and wanted her fill out the ballot with the information they gave her
“He pulled out his phone and he said, do you got nice penmanship? Well, yeah, why? Okay, here’s the to do is write this name on this form and then sign the signature and I’ll pay you — I said, I’m not doing that — He was trying to pay me to do voter fraud”
Democrats have a highly sophisticated worker of people who go out and pay people to vote Democrat
We need a federal audit of California’s election immediately
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 1 person
this is ridiculous! what else have they been doing besides going on vacation every 3 months?
LikeLiked by 1 person
EXCERPT: “Colorado imposed a loyalty oath on lawyers as a condition of access to the state’s court system, pledging they would not assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Some federal agencies required defendants to accept gag orders as a condition of civil settlements, pledging they would not question the government’s case, no matter how weak they thought it.
These speech mandates, some going back more than 50 years, have come crashing down in recent weeks as The Centennial State opts against further cementing its reputation as a First Amendment flouter and the second Trump administration seeks to distinguish itself from its predecessors – including Trump I – as a paragon of prosecutorial propriety.
Buried in immigrant-protection legislation (HB 26-1276) signed into law last week is a provision that nixes SB 25-276’s requirement, only implemented two months ago, that lawyers swear “under penalty of perjury” they won’t use “nonpublic” information from the court system to help federal immigration enforcement.
The now-rescinded law had provoked outrage from some lawyers who faced the prompt when they tried to log in to the e-filing system, as well as legal scrutiny from watchdogs including Judicial Watch and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which told Just the News it had been “gearing up to sue” Colorado if it didn’t reverse course……”
https://justthenews.com/nation/free-speech/decades-censorship-erased-weeks-colorado-and-feds-rush-preempt-court-rulings
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
i agree 100%!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just The News: “President Donald Trump on Thursday warned that the United States could not endure the consequences of birthright citizenship ahead of an expected Supreme Court decision on the matter.
“The United States of America cannot live with the shackles of Birthright Citizenship. It is not economically, or otherwise, sustainable, and no other Country in the World, of consequence, does it!” Trump posted on Truth Social.
The Supreme Court issued a series of opinions on Thursday morning, but did not release its highly anticipated ruling on Trump’s executive order directing federal agencies to interpret the 14th Amendment as not granting citizenship to the children of illegal aliens.
The administration has sought to eliminate the longstanding interpretation of the 14th Amendment so as to crack down on so-called birth tourism and “anchor babies.”
Though the Court has already heard oral arguments, it has yet to issue its opinion.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
they are waiting till the last possible moment to issue this decision so they can hide away in their protected houses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
this is a long article discussing the lack of judicial reprimanding. a married federal judge was having sex in her chambers with a cop and her staff knew about it. Furthermore, she often rubber stamped decisions made by clerks instead of writing her own. When it all came to light she was not impeached, she was told to write apology letters to the clerks addressing specifically her actions that were wrong. She wrote the letters basically saying I’m sorry you were mad type of thing. She still sits on the bench–protected by the upper echelons of the judicial system.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/11/us/eleanor-ross-judge-sex-misconduct.html?unlocked_article_code=1.pVA.2K6f.wt3S4u1Ob6bt&smid=url-share
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are a LOT of judges who shouldn’t be judges!
LikeLiked by 1 person
agreed! but no one but no one seems to have a reign on them at all. smh
LikeLiked by 1 person
Huh….that’s a first. I saw a Momma or Poppa Robin hovering next to the jelly feeder gathering jelly, then dropping down to feed it to a fledgling Robin! Amazing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
sweet!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Filly? sent you an email.
LikeLiked by 1 person