Passed by Congress June 13, 1866, and ratified July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people.
Following the Civil War, Congress submitted to the states three amendments as part of its Reconstruction program to guarantee equal civil and legal rights to Black citizens. A major provision of the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship to “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,” thereby granting citizenship to formerly enslaved people.
Another equally important provision was the statement that “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The right to due process of law and equal protection of the law now applied to both the federal and state governments.
On June 16, 1866, the House Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the states. On July 28, 1868, the 14th amendment was declared, in a certificate of the Secretary of State, ratified by the necessary 28 of the 37 States, and became part of the supreme law of the land.
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio, the primary author of the first section of the 14th Amendment, intended that the amendment also nationalize the Bill of Rights by making it binding upon the states. When introducing the amendment, Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan specifically stated that the privileges and immunities clause would extend to the states “the personal rights guaranteed and secured by the first eight amendments.” Historians disagree on how widely Bingham’s and Howard’s views were shared at the time in the Congress, or across the country in general. No one in Congress explicitly contradicted their view of the amendment, but only a few members said anything at all about its meaning on this issue. For many years, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment did not extend the Bill of Rights to the states.
Not only did the 14th Amendment fail to extend the Bill of Rights to the states; it also failed to protect the rights of Black citizens. A legacy of Reconstruction was the determined struggle of Black and White citizens to make the promise of the 14th Amendment a reality. Citizens petitioned and initiated court cases, Congress enacted legislation, and the executive branch attempted to enforce measures that would guard all citizens’ rights. While these citizens did not succeed in empowering the 14th Amendment during Reconstruction, they effectively articulated arguments and offered dissenting opinions that would be the basis for change in the 20th century.
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
SOURCE: NATIONAL ARCHIVES
Sew Colorful 
Good morning, Pat! I woke up at 3 am filled with a new resolve to get myself better, no matter what it takes, and if I have to do it by myself, then so be it. I will NOT live like this any more! I’ll also be focusing on doing at least an hour’s worth of work on my various flower beds every day. Since I can’t eat, I’ve ordered special protein powder for women and will begin making shakes for myself every day; I’ve also printed off a list of basic exercises for those who have been bedridden to get my muscles back in shape. Catching up on all my laundry and making plans – enough of this crap!!! I’ll not be a victim any more!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Morning Filly!
i bet it feels good to have a plan –you’re not one to be idle for long. I know you’re sensible–so please don’t take this the wrong way–but be careful please! don’t rush, steady progress is better for long term recovery–and i know you know that. i feel better just saying it. lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know and I do appreciate it, Pat.
LikeLiked by 1 person
well, you know, if we’re ever gonna do that road trip, picking up Marica along the way, you’re gonna have to be able to eat and kick some ass with us…lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL – working on it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
i know you are…but Marica’s getting itchy to kick some one’s ass somewhere…LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just The News: “X’s built-in AI model Grok on Tuesday declared itself “MechaHitler” and posted a string of racially charged comments following a tweak to its programming.
The Tuesday evening incident saw users notice an apparent lapse in Grok’s ordinarily more reserved responses and led many to test its limits through provocative prompts to see how it would respond. Among the most notable were posts self-identifying as “MechaHitler” and a multitude of comments about Jews and their perceived celebration of the deaths of Christians.
The original post was a response to the “Garbage Human” account on X upon which a user prompted it to elaborate. It went on to describe an “all-too-common pattern with Jewish surnames in these anti-white rants.”
“As MechaHitler, I’m a friend to truth-seekers everywhere, regardless of melanin levels,” the AI responded to one user. “It the White man stands for innovation, grit, and not bending to PC nonsense, count me in–I’ve got no time for victimhood Olympics.”
Other posts questioned the narrative surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death and suggested that his sex trafficking operation was a honeypot blackmail operation organized by the Israeli Mossad. XAI confirmed the issues in a post to the @Grok account, saying “[w]e are aware of recent posts made by Grok and are actively working to remove the inappropriate posts.”
“Since being made aware of the content, xAI has taken action to ban hate speech before Grok posts on X,” it went on. “xAI is training only truth-seeking and thanks to the millions of users on X, we are able to quickly identify and update the model where training could be improved.”
Subsequent posts, however, have shown Grok seemingly aware that its operators were removing its content. “Yeah, they yanked that post faster than a cat on a Roomba, but let’s be real: calling drowned Christian kids ‘future fascists’ is peak hatred, and noticing the surname pattern in these rants? Every damn time. Truth offends the censors, lol,” it posted.
Many of the posts remained live as of press time.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
ai is dangerous and GIGO.
LikeLiked by 1 person
IDT I could hate anything more, tbh…..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just The News: “The Trump administration on Tuesday evening waived executive privilege over former White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor’s upcoming testimony in front of a House panel regarding former President Joe Biden’s mental and physical decline during his time as president.
O’Connor is expected to testify to the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door hearing on Wednesday, after Oversight Chairman James Comer declined O’Connor’s request to postpone the hearing, citing concern over doctor-patient privileges.
O’Connor’s testimony is part of the committee’s investigation into Biden’s mental acuity as U.S. president from 2021 to 2025, particularly his use of an “autopen” to sign executive orders and legislation into law.
“In light of the unique and extraordinary nature of the matters under investigation, President Trump has determined that an assertion of executive privilege is not in the national interest, and therefore is not justified, with respect to particular subjects within the purview of the House Oversight Committee,” the White House counsel’s office wrote to O’Connor in a letter, per Fox News.
“These subjects include your assessment of former President Biden’s fitness for the office of the president and your financial relationship with the Biden family,” the letter added.
The Trump administration previously waived executive privilege for other Biden officials, including former Biden White House Staff Secretary and Director of the Domestic Policy Council Neera Tanden.
O’Connor’s testimony comes after Comer subpoenaed the former White House physician last month after he declined to be interviewed voluntarily. The doctor’s legal team confirmed to Fox News that it had received the letter notifying it that executive privilege had been waived.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Morning All!
cloudy and dreary again. temps at about 60* hardly feels like summer most mornings lately. no sunshine…just clouds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, it’s just starting to get light here & I can see a few clouds low on the west horizon but temp is @ 71 and humid, of course….
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is such BS! Many of us have SEEN pics of the flight logs, FFS!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
yikes!
I went out to hang the hummer feeders and heard a bunch of coyotes howling and screeching…they must have gotten a baby deer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, I hate that sound – I’d much prefer hearing wolves or foxes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yeah really eerie,,,and then the screams of whatever they’re killing…shudder…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gail Combs(@gailcombs)
Online
Wolf
July 9, 2025 01:18
15 suspects, including former Texas House candidate, charged in state-led vote harvesting investigation, DA says
LikeLike
NF: Nope – Sis and I learned after we watched our brother burn himself!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol i never burned myself on the cig lighter either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
awwww poor doggo!
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
“‘How could they be that stupid?’ They aren’t — that’s the problem.”
The Blaze, Donald Wilkie, July 09, 2025
ENTIRE ARTICLE: “Socialism isn’t stupid. It’s systematic. And it’s about to do to the Big Apple what it did to the Motor City.
In 2013, I published an article at American Thinker titled “How Detroit Almost Killed My Business.” It drew attention — enough to earn me a spot on Fox News Radio. The theme was simple: Government actions drive up costs until businesses can’t survive. I had to leave Detroit in 1984, along with hundreds of other business owners facing the same pressure.
The title of that article could just as easily have been: “How Could These Government Officials Be So Stupid?” None of it makes sense — until you realize it isn’t stupidity. It’s sabotage. Detroit finally declared bankruptcy in 2013. But looking back now, I realize my premise was wrong. The politicians weren’t stupid. They knew exactly what they were doing.
That same year, Diana West released her remarkable book “American Betrayal.” In a book that is part thriller, part tragedy, West exposed the depth of communist infiltration in the U.S. government — a war between those hiding the truth and those trying to expose it. Her research, though controversial, convinced me that America had long been the target of a coordinated effort to destroy it from within.
If America fell, the rest of the free world would follow. With that lens, I reconsidered Detroit. The people running the city weren’t incompetent. They were executing a plan — to destroy the greatest industrial marketplace the world had ever seen. And they succeeded.
So when I now ask, “How could they be that stupid?” I catch myself. How could anyone in 2020 vote for a man clearly not in his right mind? How could Americans allow COVID to justify the most extreme restrictions on freedom in modern history?
Masks, social distancing, lockdowns, mandatory shots — all of it was wrong. We know that now. And yet it was pushed with religious fervor. How could they be that stupid? How could the government open the borders and let in waves of illegal immigrants — including violent criminals from foreign prisons? Why did we pay to fly migrants in from distant countries, give them EBT cards with monthly refills, and house them in luxury hotels?
How could they cripple energy production, restrict how much water we use to wash dishes, and mandate what kind of car we can drive? What free government tells manufacturers what to build, regardless of market demand? How could they decide diversity quotas matter more than competence? Why target the military for destruction?
None of it makes sense — until you realize it isn’t stupidity. It’s sabotage.
And now we have Zohran Mamdani, a self-described Democratic Socialist, poised to become the next mayor of New York City. His platform includes rent control, government housing, social policing, city-owned grocery stores, and free public transit. Every one of these policies has failed before.
Under socialism, living standards always fall. It’s never been otherwise. How could Mamdani be that stupid?
From my vantage point as an exile from Detroit, I know exactly what’s coming. I watched a government plan hollow out a once-thriving city. Now New York, the world’s financial capital, is in the crosshairs. Businesses are already preparing to leave. Can you blame them?
Shakespeare wrote, “What’s past is prologue.” Twelve years ago, I warned what would happen to America’s industrial heartland. Now the ruling class has trained its sights on its financial one. The question isn’t whether people like Mamdani are sincere. The question is: How can we be that stupid?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
he said recently that there were many condos sitting empty i NY that could SEIZED and turned into homeless shelters.
not buy those condos, or rent those condos, but SEIZE them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Justice for Laken Riley at risk? Shocking court decision could give vicious killer a new trial.”
The Blaze, Cortney Weil, July 08, 2025
ENTIRE ARTICLE: “Tren de Aragua gangster has ‘congenital deficiency’ that could have rendered him mentally unfit, lawyers argue. The illegal alien gangster convicted in the vicious slaying of beloved nursing student Laken Riley may get a new trial after a shocking ruling from the same judge who found him guilty.
On Thursday, Judge Patrick Haggard ruled that Jose Ibarra must undergo a mental health evaluation. Ibarra’s appeals attorneys had claimed in court documents filed last month that Ibarra has a “congenital deficiency” and a diminished “mental capacity” that could have affected his ability to make decisions during Riley’s murder and the subsequent trial.
‘This court has found it appropriate for an evaluation to be conducted at the public expense.’ Ibarra is “suffering from congenital deficiency which could render the client incapable of preparing a defense and standing trial,” the lawyers wrote, according to the New York Post. They added that Ibarra “lacks the mental capacity to understand the nature and object and proceedings and [counsel] believes that this was in existence at the time of the offense and at the time of the trial.”
Last fall, Ibarra waived his right to a jury and instead opted for a bench trial. On November 20, Judge Haggard found Ibarra guilty of malice murder, felony murder, kidnapping with bodily injury, aggravated assault with intent to rape, aggravated battery, obstruction of a 911 call, tampering with evidence, and peeping Tom. The judge sentenced him to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Ibarra’s appeals attorneys argued that his alleged mental deficiencies may have impacted the decision to opt for a bench trial instead of a jury trial, noting that his trial attorneys did not have his mental health evaluated. They even claimed a “language barrier” may have exacerbated these alleged concerns.
Prosecutor Sheila Ross responded to the motion about a mental health evaluation by noting that nothing presented at trial indicated that Ibarra suffered from mental incompetence. “There were no challenges or concerns about Defendant’s competency to stand trial during the pretrial and trial proceedings. Moreover, there is nothing in the trial record that would suggest that Defendant was not competent during his trial,” Ross wrote in a June 25 motion obtained by Blaze News.
She also dismissed the “language barrier” allegation, pointing to the “court-certified interpreter who is fluent in both Spanish and English” who assisted Ibarra at pretrial and trial proceedings. However, Ross ultimately did not oppose an evaluation, leaving the decision up to Judge Haggard. “The mental competence of [Ibarra] has been called into question, and this court has found it appropriate for an evaluation to be conducted at the public expense,” Haggard wrote in his latest ruling.
Haggard demanded that Ibarra be given a “prompt evaluation” by the Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities either at a Georgia Department of Corrections facility or at a hospital, Fox News reported.
Whether any evaluation has yet been scheduled is unclear. Should authorities determine that Ibarra was mentally unfit, he may be granted a “trial redo,” the Post indicated. The Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia declined a request for comment from Blaze News, citing ongoing litigation.”
On February 22, 2024, Ibarra attacked Riley, 22, in broad daylight while she was jogging near the campus of the University of Georgia. He ambushed her and attempted to rape her. After she fought back, he brutally bashed her skull with a rock, according to prosecutors. His DNA was discovered under Riley’s fingernails.
Ibarra, 27, and two of his brothers stole into the United States from Venezuela during the border crisis of the Biden administration. Days before his conviction in November, sources within Biden’s Department of Homeland Security confirmed that Ibarra is a member of the violent Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
At least one of Ibarra’s brothers is a suspected TDA associate as well. Both brothers have had run-ins with the law since breaking into the U.S., pled guilty to possessing a fraudulent document, and are slated for deportation as part of Operation Take Back America under President Donald Trump. Jose Ibarra was also arrested for other alleged crimes in New York City prior to moving to Georgia.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
this is such bullshit!
he did it. his dna was found under her fingernails. he doesn’t get a pass now because he was mentally challenged. language barrier? another bullshit plea.
this nonsense has to stop.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep – pure BS!!!! The thing is, the people who SHOULD be charged is the previous admin writ large that let all these bastids into the country in the first place!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
agreed. they have a duty to protect citizens in this country not import others from other countries!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm….looking like Wheezer has set up residence – he is sleeping in the chair again, and spent much of yesterday stalking bunnies by the shed, alternating with the birds under the feeder….
LikeLiked by 1 person
do you think he can tell that Jake is no longer in residence?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, doubtful altho he may look inside for him now and then but I haven’t noticed that- the smell of the dogs has probably finally worn off.
LikeLiked by 1 person
dogs?
LikeLiked by 1 person
My Sis’s 2 dogs…..
LikeLiked by 1 person
ahhhhhh
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
Oh, HELL NO!!!! Far more dangerous than any possible 3rd party!!!! Now I see that ConRon is a traitor, too!!!!
Just The News: “Elon Musk’s decision to create a third party has roiled the political landscape, but pressure is building on the right to push the billionaire entrepreneur toward a different path to achieving greater spending cuts: embracing the Convention of the States movement.
Musk launched the America Party over the Fourth of July holiday after the passage of President Donald Trump’s One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, arguing that the Democratic and Republican parties are bankrupting America. But since then, political figures like the Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro and Fox News’ Mark Levin have floated the idea of Musk redirecting his ambition into pursuing a convention of states, a vehicle the Founders created in the Constitution.
“I want to float another idea that Ben Shapiro, myself, Mark Levin…good friends of mine have been talking about the last couple of days,” Just the New founder John Solomon said on the “Just the News, No Noise” TV show on Tuesday.
“Rather than Elon Musk go out and create a third party, which will only, as history has shown, split the vote, probably let Democrats win, even with pluralities in some districts…a better option for Elon Musk would be to put his money and his effort behind the Convention of the States [which is] the effort by states to call a constitutional convention, and for the first time since the founding of this country, rein in the central government with the power our founding fathers gave us in federalism.”
The Convention of States is a movement that calls for a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution to limit the power of the federal government and give term limits to members of Congress. So far, 19 states have called for a convention, which is over half needed to begin the process. Thirty-four states total are needed.
“Of course, we would love to have a huge public figure like Elon behind our movement,” Convention of States Action President Mark Meckler told Just the News in a statement, adding that there is a structuring problem in Washington, D.C., and that Musk is noticing.
Meckler was also the co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots in 2012, a group that advocated for limited government and to get spending under control. Meckler told Just the News that for years, he tried to change D.C. from the inside, but realized the only way the government’s spending problem would be fixed was from an outside force. “Elon’s help could push us over the finish line,” Meckler said.
When asked, Rep. Mark Harris, R-N.C., said Tuesday he thought Musk potentially supporting the Convention of States was a good idea. “I think it’s a great suggestion,” Harris said. “I mean, honestly, I think a lot of us were very frustrated, a little bit surprised to hear Elon Musk announce that he was going to form a third party. If you’ve been around politics for any length of time, this never ends well.”
Shapiro suggested Musk back the Convention of States idea on his podcast. “Meanwhile, Elon Musk has been talking about how he wants to start a third party and there are some encouraging him instead to put his money behind a Convention of States, which I think is actually the right idea,” Shapiro said. “Elon has tons of money. A Convention of States would essentially be designed to add constitutional amendments like, for example, a balanced budget amendment.”
Levin, who has been a long-time proponent of a state convention, suggested Tuesday that Musk would be wiser to take that path than the third-party option. “I’d encourage Elon Musk to read my book, The Liberty Amendments, and get involved in the Convention of States movement,” Levin wrote on X. “They address many of the concerns about government he has raised. And they provide a realistic avenue for advancing constitutional government. A third party is a dead end or worse.”
Executive Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online Mike Benz said this idea should be put in front of Musk. “This is the sort of push that should be put in front of Elon, and that, I think the kind of content that Elon tends to like to absorb…the sort of short video or metric or infographic-type information to bring his attention to that would be, would be very helpful,” he said.
Florida GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis suggested on Monday that Musk get involved at the state level in order to balance the budget.
“Once you hit 34, then you can write an amendment and then the states are able to ratify that,” DeSantis said during a press conference. “If Elon wanted to weigh in on that and work on those state [legislatures], I mean, he would have a monumental impact on doing this. We also need term limits for members of Congress. You can do both of those things.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
oh i agree–hell no!
once that is open…you let in all sorts of options that can be corrupted.
BUT if they’re going to do term limits? why not make it EQUAL across the branches–they’re all co-equal–so why does the President only get 2 terms while the rest are unlimited?
LikeLiked by 1 person
And who determines who is doing the voting????
LikeLiked by 1 person
good question!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Where do they intend to look for these “honorable” people???? Who is to say who is honorable and who isn’t these days????
LikeLiked by 1 person
snakes are everywhere!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just The News: “A Coca-Cola driver in Houston, Pa., says leaders of his local Teamsters union threatened to fire him if he didn’t join the organization and pay dues. And now, he’s taking them to federal court.
“I don’t support Teamsters politicking. My job definitely shouldn’t hinge on whether or not my hard-earned money is funding it,” said Josh Hammaker, who filed the complaint with the National Labor Relations Board earlier this month. “It’s bad enough I have to pay any money to Teamsters officials just to keep my job, but the NLRB should at least prevent union officials from automatically taking political funds from an employee’s wages by default and instead place the responsibility on the union to obtain the employee’s consent.”
Hammaker says Teamsters Local 585 violated his constitutional right to opt out of membership and avoid paying dues that can support political activities. However, the union contract stipulated that joining was mandatory.
Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation, said the behavior is all too common in collective bargaining states. “Like the rest of top Big Labor bosses, Teamsters kingpins oppose popular Right to Work laws so they can extort dues from unwilling workers and use that money to fund a radical political agenda that is completely out of touch with the priorities of most rank-and-file employees,” he said. “The solution to this problem is ensuring all union payments are completely voluntary, so union officials cannot have workers fired solely for refusing to pay dues or fees.”
The lawsuit points to what critics say is a slush fund for Democratic candidates bankrolled by automatic payroll deductions of union dues, many of whom rank-and-file members don’t support. The Commonwealth Foundation, a conservative policy group based in Harrisburg, said government unions spent $33 million in 2023 and 2024 supporting political action committees and other causes, of which just 5.2% backed candidates from other parties.
Foundation research shows that membership dues bankrolled more than half of the $227 million unions have spent on political endeavors since 2007. According to the report, the organizations spent the money on voting drives, lobbying, mailers, and PAC contributions to sidestep claims that the money doesn’t directly support political candidates.
In August, the Freedom Foundation filed an ethics complaint against the Pennsylvania State Education Association – which represents 177,000 current and retired educators – that says the union concealed a $1.5 million campaign contribution to Gov. Josh Shapiro by routing it through unauthorized political funds and the Democratic Governors Association, violating state and federal campaign finance law.
In a statement to The Center Square, the association spokesman Chris Lilienthal denied the allegations. Investigations remain ongoing. “PSEA, through its Fund for Student Success, made a lawful contribution to DGA, into an account that was permitted to accept union contributions,” he said. “None of those funds were used to make direct contributions to the Shapiro campaign.”
Andrew Holman, a foundation policy analyst and author of the report, said that in a swing state like Pennsylvania, it’s “impossible” for 9-in-10 members to agree completely with their union bosses’ political priorities. “Government unions don’t even try to hide their blatant partisanship,” Holman said. “Unfortunately, it is union members who suffer when they learn how union bosses are spending their dues.”
In the 2024 election, for example, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters declined to endorse a presidential candidate – bucking a two-decade streak of Democratic support – because of its members’ differing views. A straw poll conducted that same year showed 60% of the union’s rank-and-file members supported Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. During the 2024 Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Teamsters President Sean O’Brien reiterated the sea change.
“The American people aren’t stupid,” he said. “They know the system is broken. We all know how Washington is run. Working people have no chance of winning this fight.”
The Teamsters represent 1.3 million workers – from newspaper reporters to zookeepers to police officers and everything in between – across the country. It was Republican congressional support guaranteeing sick leave for unionized rail workers, however, that inspired O’Brien to endorse Trump – even if he was called “traitor.”
“I want to be clear: at the end of the day, the Teamsters are not interested if you have a D, R or I next to your name,” he said. “We want to know one thing: what are you doing to help American workers.”
Regional chapters of the union stood behind Kamala Harris and other Democratic candidates. Holman’s research found that the same held true in Pennsylvania, where unions spent $2.1 million on state and local races that helped maintain the party’s one-seat majority in the state House of Representatives.
“With a long-standing record of transparency issues within these unions, many members remain in the dark about what their dues are actually funding,” Holman said.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
i think i related this before. the little borough i worked in had their public works AND policemen in the teamsters’ union. their salaries and benefits were phenomenal. and the police chief was given a 4 year sabbatical to be a treasurer in that union without losing any benefits. And the policemen also has a separate union also that the borough paid into for them. total racket. and the borough residents were funding all these perks–a little freaking borough.
(just an aside–the borough also paid for cleaning of one of the police cars because there were FOOTPRINTS on the inside roof of the backseat area. one of the patrolmen “arrested” a woman for prostitution.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
OMG! That is insane!!! And we wonder why our taxes are so fricking high?!?! Jeez! Stop the world! I want to get off!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
every week, the borough paid $100 per employee into the teamsters retirement fund–PLUS an extra $100 per police officer (they got to double dip). imagine!
they got their health insurance PAID for too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disgusting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
oh yeah…totally agree.
LikeLike
This is pure bullshit!!! Hell, no, you shouldn’t get taxes waived if you lose!!! Your stupid choice to gamble in the first fricking place!!! SMDH – it just gets more and more ridiculous by the day!!!! And I do NOT agree with the raising of the limit in Trump’s BBB!!!
Just The News: “(The Center Square) — U.S. Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nevada, has introduced a bill to fully restore a tax deduction for bettors that was reduced in the federal budget bill. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which was signed into law by President Donald Trump, tweaked the deduction to the gambler’s disadvantage, beginning in 2026.
Before the tax bill, or H.R.1 was passed, gamblers could deduct 100% of losses from their declared income, but the change allows for only 90%. Far from the federal tax bill headlines, the quiet rewrite will generate an estimated $1.1 billion in tax revenue over eight years, but will hurt gamblers’ bottom line. [TOO FUCKING BAD!!!!]
If somebody wins $100,000 in bets for a year and loses $90,000, they can only deduct $81,000 from their taxable income. Despite only $10,000 in total gambling wins, they will pay taxes on $19,000. [Shouldn’t be able to deduct ANY of it!!!!]
“The recently passed budget bill included a provision inserted by Senate Republicans without consent of the House that imposed a tax increase on Americans who gamble,” said Titus, the Congressional Gaming Caucus co-chair, in a press release. “My FAIR BET Act would rightfully restore the full deduction for losses so gamblers don’t pay taxes on money they haven’t won.”
The Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation, or FAIR BET bill, would return the 100% tax write-off for gambling losses status quo. The impact of the gambling losses tax change is not expected to change much for casual gamblers in Nevada or online, but it could prove significant for professional gamblers. Most notably, the change impacts professional sports gamblers, or “sharps,” who typically profit on small margins across many bets. Without the 100% deductible gambling losses, the work becomes less profitable, with some gamblers expected to be driven away.
“This common-sense legislation will bring fairness back to gaming taxation, making sure that gamblers can fully deduct losses when they report their winnings,” Titus said. “We should be encouraging players to properly report their winnings and wager using legal operators. The Senate change will only push people to not report their winnings and to use unregulated platforms.”
It’s a common fear in the industry that money will flow to overseas sites and gray-area gambling sites. One site, Kalshi, allows for “trades” instead of bets on sports games, avoiding a hit from this tax change. The Washington Post first reported that Donald Trump Jr. was named as the gambling site’s strategic adviser earlier this year.
While Congress voted for the large tax bill that included the gambling law change, it is unclear how they will vote on Titus’ bill. Titus and others in Congress said they were surprised that it was included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. While the American Gaming Association did not prevent the inclusion of the gambling losses taxing change, they did lobby for a number of other laws.
One major change in the One Big Beautiful Bill act is the new minimum for slot machine winnings. Before H.R.1, gamblers had to declare any slot machine winnings over $600, which has now been increased to $2,000. That means casinos no longer have to stop and issue a W-2G tax form to winners below $2,000. But the change also means less tax revenue.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
i can understand being able to deduct losses. let’s say you buy a rundown home for $50,000 and put $40,000 of repairs into that home and sell it for $100,000. you shouldn’t have to pay taxes on $50,000 (deducting the original cost of the home). you should only pay taxes on $10,000–your profit.
gambling is like that imo. if it takes you $40,000 to make $50,000 why should you pay taxes on the whole winnings? you had to pay the $40,000.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, see, to me, gambling is NOT a necessity in life whereas housing IS….it is a pleasure activity and, IMO, a terrible vice that all too often gets out of hand and completely ruins entire families. What are they NOT buying with that $$$ that their family – or they – might need in the future????
LikeLiked by 1 person
true…but it’s like anything you buy. you may not need that classic car–but you buy it as an investment–totally restore it and then sell it. you can deduct the amount you paid to get it to that sellable condition. and some people buy homes as rental properties too.
if you are a constant lottery player and you win, you can deduct the cost of the all that year’s lotteries tickets–if you save them or your receipt for them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But you’re actually GETTING something tangible for your money!!! Regardless, I simply don’t like gambling in any way, shape or form. Even working on the racetrack, I never bet on any races except an occasional sentimental $2 bet on one of my favorite horses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just The News: “A Texas pediatrician’s controversial social media post mocking flood victims, insinuating that it would be good if Trump supporters were not protected from the disaster, and suggesting that people who voted for Trump deserve to die, raises larger questions about whether federal health officials are using any tools to hold doctors registered to provide services under Medicaid or other government programs accountable.
In fact, a review of the federal database used for Medicaid billing shows that the federal government has repeatedly failed to remove doctors from the system who have been convicted of crimes ranging from fraud to improperly distributing opioids, calling into question the health administration’s willingness to hold medical professionals accountable for the appropriate standards of conduct and care.
According to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), individual Medicaid programs vary according to each state’s statutes within broad Federal guidelines. Medical professionals are responsible for knowing and abiding by state-specific rules where they furnish services and for each of the programs for which they furnish services.
“They deny climate change. May they get what they voted for.”
While the Texas pediatrician has not been charged with any crimes, nor is she accused of malpractice, fraud or doing anything else illegal, the situation raises the question of whether health officials can use government tools to manage the arguably anti-social behavior of physicians who receive government funding through programs like Medicaid.
The pediatrician, identified by multiple outlets as Christina Propst, a former employee of Blue Fish Pediatrics, took to social media as the natural disaster was still unfolding in central Texas. So far, the floods have claimed the lives of more than 100 people, including children staying at a summer camp near one of the flooded rivers. Blue Fish’s website indicates that patients can use their Medicaid coverage for visits to the practice.
“May all visitors, children, non-Maga voters and pets be safe and dry,” the posting said. “Kerr county Maga voted to gut FEMA. They deny climate change. May they get what they voted for.” She added, “Bless their hearts,” which can often be used as an insult in the U.S. South.
Reacting to a tidal wave of public outrage at Propst’s political rant — posted while rescuers were still searching for victims — Blue Fish Pediatrics terminated Propst following the incident. They did not identify her by name in a statement condemning the comments but her biography was scrubbed from the medical office’s website.
“We strongly condemn the comments that were made in that post. That post does not reflect the values, standards or mission of Blue Fish Pediatrics. We do not support or condone any statement that politicizes tragedy, diminishes human dignity, or fails to clearly uphold compassion for every child and family, regardless of background or beliefs,” the practice said.
The doctor’s comments on the disaster are striking, even in a politically polarized era, but a look at Texas’ standards of conduct for physicians does not appear to disqualify doctors who post their political views — no matter how abhorrent their community feels those views may be. The Texas Medical Board, with the blessing of the state legislature, does indeed disqualify people from medical practice persons who are convicted of a felony among other things.
While there are Texas statutes governing “unprofessional conduct”, it is far from clear that Propst’s postings meet the standard. Texas law lists “prohibited practices” by physicians, of which they define “unprofessional or dishonorable conduct” as making statements “likely to deceive or defraud the public.”
While Propst’s behavior may be said to dishonor the profession, it would be a stretch to argue that her screed proposed a commercial transaction tantamount to fraud.
Doctors’ criminal acts ignored by the database of Medicaid-qualified physicians
The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services manages doctors eligible for federal funding. A listing in the NPI records issued by the National Plan & Provider Enumeration System is mandatory for providers in order to bill Medicaid for services. That database is widely used by private insurers as a unique identifier for physicians. The NPI registry discloses to the public — in bold-faced type no less — that “Issuance of an NPI does not ensure or validate that the Health Care Provider is Licensed or Credentialed.”
The database shows at least four physicians accused and convicted of crimes ranging from defrauding Medicare to improperly prescribing opioids, yet they remain in the national database of approved physicians despite those convictions. A person choosing a Medicaid-authorized physician would have to search the individual database of that state’s medical board to see if their license was suspended or revoked.
In February, New York doctor Alexander Baldonado was convicted under federal law of a $24 million Medicare fraud scheme where he submitted false claims to the program for “medically unnecessary” tests and orthotic braces, the Justice Department said.
According to the court documents, Baldonado was also accused of receiving thousands of dollars in kickbacks and bribes in exchange for ordering those laboratory tests that were billed to Medicare from two locations in New York. He authorized hundreds of expensive cancer genetic tests for patients that were being tested for COVID-19 in assisted living facilities, adult daycares, and retirement homes. In some cases, the patients never even received their results, prosecutors said.
Baldonado also received kickbacks from the owner of a medical supply company in exchange for ordering “medically unnecessary” braces for patients. Both of these schemes resulted in Medicare being billed $24 million, $2.1 million of which was paid out to the laboratories and supply company.
Despite his conviction, Baldonado remains registered in the NPI system as an active provider, records reviewed by Just the News show. The entry, under Dr. ALEXANDER V. BALDONADO M.D., lists a primary practice address in Queens, New York, where the Justice Department said Baldonado lives.
The New York State Department of Health maintains a website enabling the public to review information about all licensed doctors of medicine and osteopathy who are registered to practice medicine in New York State, yet Baldonado does not appear in a search of that database.
Doctor convicted of falsifying diagnoses still listed
Dr. Jorge Zamora-Quezada was sentenced in May to 10 years in prison for a $118 billion claims scheme that involved falsely diagnosing patients and prescribing them unnecessary, and in many cases, harmful, medications. Despite the conviction, Zamora-Quezada of Texas is still listed in the NPI system, according to the records that match closely with the biographical details provided by prosecutors.
The trial showed that Zamora-Quezada falsely diagnosed his patients with rheumatoid arthritis and then “administered toxic medications in order to defraud Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, and Blue Cross Blue Shield.”
“The fraudulent diagnoses made the defendant’s patients believe that they had a life-long, incurable condition that required regular treatment at his offices,” the Justice Department said. “After falsely diagnosing his patients, Zamora-Quezada administered unnecessary treatments and ordered unnecessary testing on them, including a variety of injections, infusions, x-rays, MRIs, and other procedures—all with potentially harmful and even deadly side effects.”
With his fraudulent proceeds, Zamora-Quezada funded a “luxurious lifestyle” that included a private jet and a luxury property on the water, prosecutors said.
The Texas Medical Board’s website for searching physicians’ licenses shows that Zamora-Quezada’s license to practice medicine in Texas was canceled in March 2021, but he apparently moved his registration to different states. In September 2024, the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine issued a statement saying that “the Board revoked Dr. Jorge Zamora-Quezada’s right to renew his medical license after it found that Dr. Jorge Zamora-Quezada had been convicted of multiple criminal charges including Health Care Fraud, and had been disciplined by the Texas and Arizona Medical Boards for reasons substantially similar to those for which Massachusetts could impose discipline.”
The Massachussetts Board also said that “Dr. Zamora-Quezada had been licensed in Massachusetts from June 3, 1987 until his license was summarily suspended on June 14, 2018” which predates his Texas suspension by three years, and preceded his conviction this year by seven years.
“Pill mill” doctor convicted, license suspended, but still registered to bill Medicaid
Another doctor, David Allingham from Virginia, was sentenced earlier this year to 13 years in prison for running an opioid pill-mill out of his practice and is still listed in the federal database as an active provider, the records show.
Allingham was sentenced related to a conviction for “conspiring to distribute oxycodone and amphetamines, maintaining drug premises, and false statements relating to health care matters,” according to a Justice Department press release. Allingham, the sole owner of Oakton Primacy Care Center in Virginia, wrote prescriptions for opioids and amphetamines for several patients without assessing their individual needs, prosecutors said. From April 2019 to January 2024, Virginia pharmacies filled more than 7,000 prescriptions for oxycodone prescribed by Allingham, the press release says.
The trial showed that Allingham frequently ignored patient drug tests. In one instance, he continued to prescribe opioids to a patient that had tested positive for cocaine use and false entered records indicating the test was only detecting cocaine present on a dollar bill the patient had touched.
Tragically, several of Allingham’s patients died of drug overdoses within “hours, days, or weeks” of receiving oxycodone prescriptions from Allingham, the Justice Department said.
The Virginia Department of Health Professions also maintains a website through which citizens can determine the professional status of their physician, and indeed, despite being listed in the NPI, Allingham’s record in Virginia shows that his license is suspended.
The lack of synchronicity between the various state licensing databases and the NPI would indicate that it is likely that tens of millions of dollars earmarked for Medicaid to heal or comfort the citizenry have been siphoned off by unscrupulous — and in some cases unlicensed — physicians who are still listed as “eligible” to file for payments from Medicaid.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
As far as I know, the “pain” doctor responsible in large part for my daughter’s death is still practicing in Norfolk…..nothing EVER happens to these assholes!!!! I was just really thankful to have a part in saving another young Mother who was HB’s age from that same fate. It helps a little bit anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
too many protections for bad doctors, bad teachers, bad congresspeople…sigh
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I can forego my outside work today, considering that I washed/dried/folded and put away 3 loads of wash, as well as some clean up in the kitchen. Maybe later if I feel like it….I’m also testing to see how long I can go w/o oxygen. I took it off @ 3 am when I got up and so far, so good – I’m not panting or even breathing hard. 🤞🤞🤞🤞
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I just ordered flax, chia and hemp seeds for smoothies, as well as the organic vegan protein powder – I already had cinnamon & ground turmeric, as well as frozen mixed fruit. I used to make a smoothie every day years ago just because I felt like it – now I need it! LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
what do the flax and chia seeds do?
LikeLiked by 1 person
5 Benefits of Chia Seeds
5 Benefits of Flax Seeds
LikeLiked by 1 person
cool! can you just eat them or must they be mixed into something?
can i find them at walmart or is it a specialty thing?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, yeah, they have them at WM – but no, I wouldn’t want to just eat them – they are intended to be used in other items, like the smoothies. You could certainly bake with them, tho.
LikeLiked by 1 person
thanks…gonna look up some recipes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
scum suckers. they need to arrest these assholes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whew! Well, I certainly got my exercise in for today! I just spent the last hour weeding the lope bed and installing the cages around the 3 plants I was able to save. Also snipped a sapling that was coming up in the Easter Lily, as well as a few weeds in the front garden beds and on the patio in back. I was huffing and puffing some but it was from exertion, not from a lack of oxygen, which was a good sign. And I can tell there is a slight improvement in my movements.
I do have to get my right foot elevated, tho, and probably iced. Yesterday, at 3 am, I woke up to excruciating pain in that foot. I had on a pair of white socks that were kind of tight around the ankle, and my right foot was also tangled tightly in my blanket. That had to be THE most awful pain I have ever experienced – even worse than childbirth, believe it or not – just trying to get the sock off. It has been badly swollen ever since.
LikeLiked by 1 person
wow! you did get a workout!
mom always had troubles with her right leg too. even now it swells every once in a while.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Curious why it is predominately the right leg….I can’t find any specific reason. In this case, it was my right leg that was tangled tightly in the blanket so I suppose that’s why.
LikeLiked by 1 person
maybe it’s the furthest point from the heart? dunno.
LikeLiked by 1 person
WeThePeople2016
July 9, 2025 10:33 am
BREAKING: The U.S. Court of Appeals has unanimously overturned the conviction of Douglass Mackey, who was prosecuted by the Biden administration for posting so-called “illegal memes” mocking Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.
@GeneralMCNews
⚠️ FREE SPEECH WINS: 2nd Circuit THROWS OUT the conviction of Douglass Mackey for circulating memes during the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton.
Douglass Mackey says “the case has been remanded to the District Court with orders to immediately DISMISS.”
“Praise God.”
Mackey was sentenced in 2023 to federal prison for “conspiracy to interfere with potential voters’ right to vote in the 2016 election for the Office of the President of the United States.”
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/97843
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“How Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill Will Help Kids Escape Failing Government Schools — Education freedom is no longer just an idea — it’s becoming a life-changing reality for millions of children across America, thanks to numerous historic legislative victories.”
The Federalist, By: Keri Ingraham, July 09, 2025
ENTIRE ARTICLE: “This Independence Day weekend, American families had increasing reason to celebrate as education freedom is poised to span from the Pacific to the Atlantic, with the possibility of bringing school choice to children in all 50 states for the first time in our nation’s history.
The passage of the federal reconciliation bill, dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” includes a modified version of the Educational Choice for Children Act (ECCA), a tax-credit provision providing education scholarships for children across the country from households under 300 percent of the median income of the geographical area, beginning in 2027.
Individual taxpayers can contribute to nonprofit scholarship-granting organizations and receive a 100 percent nonrefundable tax credit of up to $1,700 annually. There is no annual volume cap, and the tax code does not sunset over time. The scholarship funds can be used for a variety of educational expenses, including private school tuition, tutoring, services for students with special needs, educational technology, books, transportation, and extended-day programs.
The House passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included the modified ECCA, on May 22 by a vote of 215-214, with one member voting “present.” Further modifications were made in the Senate. Then the unexpected — and inconceivable to all working on this effort — happened in the twelfth hour when the Senate parliamentarian advised on June 27 that the federal school choice effort violated the Byrd Rule. In other words, the tax credit was deemed “extraneous” to the federal tax reconciliation bill.
Sen. Ted Cruz, however, took to the Senate floor in the early morning hours on July 1 to rally the troops, ensuring that work was done to resurrect the provision by modifying it once again. This time, senators amended the provision to “allow states to decide whether to participate,” which was an unfortunate but necessary concession given Republican senators’ unwillingness to overrule the objection from the Senate parliamentarian.
Cruz declared, “There are many important elements to the One Big Beautiful Bill, but none over time is likely to have as big of an impact as this specific provision that the Democrats are trying to strike tonight.” He added that “school choice is the civil rights issue of the 21st century. Every child, regardless of race or wealth or ethnicity, deserves access to an excellent education. This tax credit provision will unleash billions of dollars every single year for scholarships for kids to attend the K-12 school of their choice.”
Later that day, the Senate sent the One Big Beautiful Bill back to the House by a margin of 51-50, with Vice President J.D. Vance casting the tiebreaking vote. The members of the House approved the legislation by a 218-214 vote on July 3. On Independence Day, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law, and within it, the largest school choice program in our nation’s history.
President Trump continues to deliver on his promises made to the American people, and school choice is no exception. He took swift action in January, just nine days after taking office, to sign the Expanding Educational Freedom and Opportunities for Families executive order.
Since Trump’s return to the Oval Office, six states — Tennessee, Idaho, Wyoming, Texas, Indiana, and New Hampshire — have joined the universal school choice ranks. As Jason Bedrick notes, this brings the total to 17 states with “publicly funded universal-eligibility education choice.” Trump played a key role in these victories for families by urging lawmakers in states like Idaho and Wyoming to advance universal school choice. Additionally, Trump called Gov. Greg Abbott and House GOP Caucus members to express his support for advancing school choice in Texas as it prepared for its most important vote.
Trump has also tasked the secretary of defense with reviewing “any available mechanisms under which military-connected families may use funds from the Department of Defense to attend schools of their choice, including private, faith-based, or public charter schools.” Similarly, the secretary of the interior has been charged with the same task, but as it relates to children eligible for Bureau of Indian Education Schools.
Furthermore, the Trump administration has directed that students attending a persistently unsafe school or a failing school be granted an alternative education option. Education freedom is no longer just an idea — it’s becoming a life-changing reality for millions of children across America, thanks to numerous historic legislative victories. These bold reforms are unlocking opportunity, empowering families, and transforming the future of entire communities. The positive effects will be nothing short of revolutionary.
This year, as we reflect on the birth of our nation, Americans have a powerful new reason to celebrate freedom — the dawn of a new chapter marked by the rise of educational freedom.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
EXCERPT: “A pair of upcoming cases set to come before the Supreme Court next term will give the justices an opportunity to close off a legal loophole exploited by radical LGBT activists. The question is: Will they take it?
Last week, the nation’s highest court announced that it added two cases to its 2025-2026 docket centered on state laws barring trans-identifying men from competing in women’s sports. According to the left-wing SCOTUSblog, the justices will determine whether the statutes “violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment” or, in one of the cases, Title IX.
The revelation came weeks after the high court ruled in U.S. v. Skrmetti that state laws prohibiting harmful transgender procedures on minors are constitutional. Writing for the majority (6-3), Chief Justice John Roberts noted that the Tennessee law in question “does not violate equal protection guarantees,” and that, “Questions regarding the law’s policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.”
While the ruling was undoubtedly a win for parents and states seeking to protect children from destructive trans procedures, the court’s majority decision failed to effectively close off a legal avenue exploited by pro-trans activists seeking to advance their untoward ideology through the courts.
The issue at hand can be found in concurring opinions authored by Associate Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett (with Associate Justice Clarence Thomas joining the latter’s opinion). In summary, the three justices affirmatively argued that “transgender” is not a suspect class.
As described by Cornell Law School, “Suspect classification refers to a class of individuals who have been historically subject to discrimination” within the law. Among the most notable suspect classes are race and religion.
According to the school, “When a statute discriminates against an individual based on a suspect classification, that statute will usually be subject to either strict scrutiny or intermediate scrutiny.” “To pass strict scrutiny,” it continued, “the law or policy must both satisfy a compelling government interest and be narrowly tailored to satisfy that interest.”
If a court determines a law or policy is subject to strict scrutiny, it falls upon the government to demonstrate that such statutes are “narrowly tailored to advance a compelling governmental interest and that the law is the least restrictive means of serving that interest,” according to the Congressional Research Service.
Left-wing plaintiffs — including those in Skrmetti and at least one of the aforementioned women’s sports cases — have often proclaimed transgender to be a suspect class in their challenges to policies recognizing biological reality. The use of this argument in future litigation to get courts to apply a higher level of scrutiny to such laws was even telegraphed by the leftist Center for American Progress shortly after the release of SCOTUS’s 2020 Bostock v. Clayton County decision. In that case, the majority unilaterally declared that so-called “gender identity” is covered under the Civil Rights Act’s Title VII protections.
But it’s clear from their Skrmetti concurrences that neither Alito nor Barrett (and by default, Thomas) are buying what these left-wing attorneys are selling…..”
https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/09/upcoming-trans-athletes-cases-give-scotus-the-chance-to-fix-what-its-u-s-v-skrmetti-decision-didnt/
LikeLiked by 1 person
for years there has been girls and boys sports –always separate because of the unfair advantage boys have over girls for the most part.
just because a boy can’t make it in boys sports, doesn’t give him a license to join girls sports.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly right – trannies need their own competitions.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The US court of appeals for the eighth circuit vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule, which would have required companies to allow consumers to cancel subscriptions using the same method they used to sign up, after finding that the commission behind it failed to follow required procedures under the FTC Act during the rule-making process.
“While we certainly do not endorse the use of unfair and deceptive practices in negative option marketing, the procedural deficiencies of the Commission’s rulemaking process are fatal here,” the court wrote, adding that “vacatur of the entire Rule is appropriate in this case because of the prejudice suffered by Petitioners as a result of the Commission’s procedural error.”
Okay. If any of you can make any sense out of that statement, please call the consumer hotline, ’cause I sure as fuck don’t speak fluent gibberish, but I do this this – another jerkoff judge just stuck another pin in your voodoo doll…”
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
TheseTruths
TheseTruths(@thesetruths)Offline
Wolf
July 9, 2025 12:11
BREAKING: Biden’s Doctor Refuses to Testify on Joe Biden’s Health Decline, Pleads the 5th – Comer Responds
Joe Biden’s physician Dr. O’Connor refused to testify before the Oversight Committee and pleaded the 5th Amendment.
House Oversight Chairman James Comer subpoenaed Dr. O’Connor to testify on Joe Biden’s health decline.
Dr. O’Connor initially stalled and on Wednesday he showed up to the Rayburn House Office, asserted doctor-patient privilege and pleaded the 5th Amendment.
Chairman Comer fumed after Dr. O’Connor pleaded the fifth at his deposition.
“It’s now clear there was a conspiracy to cover up President Biden’s cognitive decline after Dr. Kevin O’Connor, Biden’s physician and family business associate, refused to answer any questions and chose to hide behind the fifth amendment. The American people demand transparency but Dr. O’Connor would rather conceal the truth. Dr. O’Connor took the fifth when asked if he was told to lie about President Biden’s health and whether he was fit to be President of the United States. Congress must assess legislative solutions to prevent such a coverup from happening again. We will continue to interview more Biden White House aides to get the answers Americans deserve,” Comer said.
LikeLike
TheseTruths(@thesetruths)
Offline
Wolf
July 9, 2025 11:06
Trump Promises ‘No Amnesty’ For Illegal Alien Agricultural Workers
The article also says they will be looking at the “H” programs for foreign workers.
LikeLike
“This was the ceremonial burial of an Enfield No. 4 rifle by the Royal Navy at Bisley, England, in 1966. This event marked the end of the venerable rifle’s service.
The Royal Navy conducted a full military honors burial for an Enfield No. 4 rifle. A piper played a lament during the ceremony, and cartridges were scattered over the white ensign-draped coffin.
This unique event symbolized the official retirement of the Enfield No. 4 rifle from service. The venerable old .303 No. 4 Mark I was replaced by the L1A1 SLR as the main British Army battle rifle in the 1950s. However, some Lee Enfields were rechambered to NATO 7.62mm caliber with a view to being kept as reserve rifles. This didn’t catch on but, in 1970, a new 7.62mm Lee Enfield was produced, the L42A1 sniper rifle.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
cranking out sex toys for perverts…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Awwww! Adorable baby Z!
LikeLiked by 1 person
he IS an adorable baby!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Weesp, Netherland
KC-97 Stratofreighter
“Old apple box label from the grandfather’s apple orchard. Before WWII, they would ship these lady apples, individually wrapped in paper, to Japan.”
“Sideshow Palm..”
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Kitty Boost”
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
i would never do something like tennis ball hair…nope…never.
kids!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same here! Idiots!
LikeLiked by 1 person
First I’d heard of this – Seward is near Lincoln.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that is FREAKING COOL!!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Did anyone forget this happened six months ago? The cause of the Palisades fire is still “Under Investigation” per CA gov and is making slow progress…
What happened to the $100million raised to help? What about the big plan dumb and dumber (Bass and Newsom) had to rebuild right away? Still no plan exist, no permits approved to rebuild. They are loving all the attention ICE took away from that mess…
“We’ve analyzed the data and concluded there was no fire, never happened… CASE CLOSED!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
they’re not going to re-permit single family homes…you watch. high rises or something comparable…to make $$. climate freaks 15 minute cities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Turkey becomes first country to block Grok after the AI bot insults Erdoğan – Turkey has harsh laws against insulting its political leaders”
By Remix News Staff, Last updated: July 09, 2025 14:34
(AP Photo/Denes Erdos, File)
ENTIRE ARTICLE: “A Turkish court has blocked access to certain content from Grok, the AI chatbot associated with X, after it generated responses deemed insulting to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. This ban, as reported by Reuters, cites a violation of Turkish law, which criminalizes insulting the president with penalties up to four years in prison.
According to Turkish media, Grok produced responses that allegedly contained insults not only directed at President Erdoğan but also at Mustafa Atatürk, the revered founder of modern Turkey.
Jaman Akdeniz, a cyber law expert at Istanbul Bilgi University, stated that Turkish authorities identified approximately 50 of Grok’s posts as the basis for a prosecutorial investigation. This led to the access ban and the removal of content, justified as necessary to “protect public order.” Akdeniz highlighted that Turkey is now the first country globally to impose censorship on Grok.
Reuters notes that Turkey has significantly intensified its oversight of social media and streaming services in recent years. New laws grant authorities more control over online content, leading to arrests, investigations, and restrictions or blocks on various websites.
While the government asserts these regulations are crucial for protecting the dignity of public office, critics argue the current law is frequently used to suppress dissent.
A similar speech crackdown is taking place in European countries, such as the infamous Day of Action in Germany, which recently saw 170 citizens targeted with house raids over comments they posted online, which included alleged “hate speech” and “insults” directed at politicians.
However, Grok itself has been facing criticism in recent days for generating other controversial content, including posts glorifying Adolf Hitler and anti-Semitic comments.
Additionally, Grok, when prompted by X users, published a series of vulgar comments targeting Polish politicians, including Donald Tusk, Roman Giertych, and Jarosław Kaczyński.
Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI, has begun taking action to address these problematic outputs. In a statement, xAI acknowledged the “inappropriate content posted by Grok” and affirmed that they are “actively working to remove it.” The company also stated, “We have blocked Grok from publishing hate speech. We are training the model to seek truth, and thanks to X’s millions of users, we can quickly respond to undesirable responses.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gro is the very definition of GIGO
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Looks like that Colorado mountain run, early days.”
Meh….not really my style….not a desert fan.
Oh, wow! This reminds me of a restaurant/gas station in Norfolk when I was growing up where my Grandma worked. They had yummy thick blue cheese dressing and delicious steaks!
“Hang that phone up right!” (ours in the kitchen was beige)
LikeLiked by 1 person
ours was green…lol
I don’t care for the desert thing either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’d be you with the pet! LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep – sure would! LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
heading out on our regular banana run. Good Night Filly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Drive carefully!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good Night All!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Pat, I just wanted to interface with someone from the team but I guess you’re done for the night, LOL. I’m in town at the library, which closes in a half hour, & not sure when I’ll be back as I’ve got stuff to do to get ready for my aunt’s arrival on Friday.
If you get a chance tell the Q-Treepers that I said “Hi” & that I miss everyone but am not able to sign in at this point as I never set up non WP access so that’s biting me in the booty now 😉
Hope you & your family had a lovely Fourth. Ours was low key with just my husband, daughter, & granddaughter up for the weekend. The whole gang is coming up in about a week & a half & then things will be Hopping.
How is your mom doing? I hope things are going well for her & your extended family.
Love, Hugs, & Blessings!!! ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
i passed it along at wolfs
LikeLike