Haunted Cemeteries

Paranormal 6 Minutes
Glenwood Cemetery

Glenwood Cemetery in Mississippi

Located in Yazoo City, this cemetery was created around 1856. It is the burial site of the famed Witch of Yazoo. Legend tells of an old woman who lived near the Yazoo River who was found tormenting fishermen. A sheriff chased her through the swamp and caught up with her just in time to watch her sink into quicksand and drown. With her last breath, she cursed the town, saying, “In 20 years, I will return and burn this town to the ground!”

On May 25, 1904, the town did indeed burn down. A total of 324 buildings were wiped out. When the townspeople approached the grave of the famed witch, the chains that normally surrounded the grave were apparently broken in two.

Bachelor’s Grove

This small abandoned cemetery is known for being one of the most haunted locations in the country. The land in this area south of Chicago was first settled in the 1820s, and the graveyard was set aside in 1864. It is reportedly home to a large amount of paranormal phenomena, including a phantom house, spirit orbs, disappearing cars, and full-bodied apparitions. According to legend, during the Prohibition era, the remains of those slain by gangsters were found in the cemetery’s adjacent lagoon, along with some illicit firearms.

The most famous apparition is known as the “Madonna of Bachelor’s Grove.” She is a lady dressed in white who often appears holding an infant on moonlit nights. In 1991, members of the Ghost Research Society conducted an investigation of the site. During the investigation, one investigator managed to capture an image of a woman who appeared to be sitting on a tombstone. The apparition was not present during the investigation and only appeared later when they developed the film.

Chestnut Hill Cemetery

During the late 1800s, disease ravaged a family in Exeter, RI. After a farmer’s wife and two daughters passed from the same mysterious illness, he and the townsfolk began suspecting vampirism was at work. They exhumed the bodies of his wife Mary and daughters Mary and Mercy. While the remains of both Marys were decomposing normally, Mercy’s remains looked strangely well-preserved, leading them to believe she was a vampire. In one story, they desecrated her grave, cut out her heart, and burned it. They mixed the ashes with water and served it to the farmer’s son Edwin, but that failed to cure his disease, which we now know was tuberculosis.

After Mercy’s passing and exhumation, people have reported seeing her ghost rise from the grave and wander through the graveyard. Others have seen orbs and heard strange sounds near her grave. Though the vampire myth persists, most now believe that the ghost is a result of the grave desecration. 

Resurrection Cemetery

This Roman Catholic cemetery was consecrated in 1904 and officially opened in 1912. It is also the alleged home of “Resurrection Mary.” According to one of the legends about this ghost, Mary was attending a dance at the Oh Henry Ballroom one night in the 1930s. After getting into an argument with her boyfriend, she decided to walk home. She never made it, instead becoming the target of a hit-and-run somewhere near the cemetery. In another version of the story, based on the real passing of Mary Bregovy in 1934, Mary was slain in a car accident and haunts Resurrection Cemetery because she is interred there. 

Since then, there have been many sightings of Mary. She appears on the side of the road or at a nearby dance hall. She asks for a ride home – her “home” being the place she was laid to rest in the Resurrection Cemetery. After the car stops in front of the graveyard, she gets out and disappears.

St Louis Cemetery

This is actually three cemeteries, with the first and second being the oldest. Built in 1789, St. Louis Cemetery No. 1 is the oldest existing cemetery in New Orleans and is considered one of the most haunted cemeteries in the world. The cemetery is composed mostly of above-ground mausoleums like most cemeteries in the area because of New Orleans’ high water table level. Notable residents of St. Louis No. 1 include Homer Plessy of Plessy v. Ferguson fame and Voodoo priestess Marie Laveau.

Laveau is said to haunt the graveyard, wandering the alleys chanting audible Voodoo curses on trespassers. She has also been said to take the form of a black cat with fiery red eyes. The ghost of her familiar, a giant black snake, also protects Laveau’s grave from those who would mock her.

Vandalism in recent years (including an incident where Laveau’s tomb was painted pink) has caused the archdiocese to ban public access to the cemetery. Only registered tour groups and the families of those buried are allowed to visit.

Greenwood Cemetery

According to legend, this cemetery was originally a Native American burial ground before white settlers started burying their deceased there in the 1830s. The graveyard was officially established in 1857.

A variety of supernatural manifestations have been reported at Greenwood. The ghosts of Confederate soldiers whose bodies supposedly were dumped in a hillside have been seen, appearing near what is now a war memorial. Another often reported ghost is that of the “Greenwood Bride,” a woman in a wedding dress whose fiancé was slain.

Bonaventure Cemetery

This Southern Gothic cemetery was formally established in 1846. While it is not the oldest cemetery in Savannah, GA, it is allegedly the most haunted. It was originally part of the massive Bonaventure Plantation owned by Colonel John Mullryne in the 1760s, then changed hands several times until it became a private cemetery in 1802. Bonaventure was sold to the city of Savannah in 1907.

Today, visitors report hearing the sounds of ghostly voices at a party echoing through the graveyard. Additionally, the grave of Gracie Watson is said to be haunted. Many have heard the sounds of a young girl crying, and the statue has been reported to weep blood.

cemetery in Salem

This cemetery is linked to the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. Here, Giles Corey was executed by being pressed to death for refusing to stand trial.

As the stones were added one by one on top of his chest, he maintained his innocence. His ghost is said to haunt the cemetery to this very day.

Westminster Presbyterian Cemetery

This Baltimore graveyard is the final resting place of Edgar Allen Poe. Established in 1786 as the Westminster Presbyterian Cemetery and located next to Westminster Hall, both the hall and cemetery are said to be haunted.

The apparition of Poe has been seen in the graveyard, perhaps lamenting his untimely demise. The notorious “Skull of Cambridge” is also buried here. Said to be the head of a slain minister, the skull allegedly emits screams that can drive people mad.

Oakland Cemetery

Standing in the center of the city since the 1850s, Oakland Cemetery survived General Sherman’s burning of Atlanta during the Civil War. From the house on top of the hill, General Hood watched the Battle of Atlanta in 1864.

In total, nearly 7,000 Confederates are buried here, including 3,000 unknown people marked by a large lion statue. It is said that late at night, you can still hear the soldiers answering roll call.

Cemetery in Kansas

This cemetery is purported to be a gateway to hell. As the story goes, somewhere in the cemetery is a stairway that leads directly into the underworld. On Halloween night it appears, and the devil emerges from the darkness. By skeptical accounts, the gateway is probably just part of an urban legend created by a professor at the University of Kansas and first published in a student newspaper in the 1970s. Since then, there has been plenty of vandalism and trespassing at the cemetery by those seeking a paranormal experience. Still, the cemetery was featured in the show Supernatural and is a pretty creepy looking place, even if it isn’t really a gateway to hell. Then again, you never know…

Source:

https://www.ranker.com/list/creepy-us-cemeteries/christopher-myers

Unknown's avatar

Published by pat frederick

Published

126 thoughts on “Haunted Cemeteries”

  1. Morning All!
    how wonderful to sleep in my own bed!!
    I didn’t move or shift positions once all night!
    now I am waiting for hubby’s wonderful coffee to finish brewing…someone bought my mom a keurig and I hate that coffee. (yup, haven’t had decent coffee in days!)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Good morning! You do know they make different flavors and brands of coffee for the Keurig? It’s not the machine – it’s the brand of coffee. I’m sure you were really happy to get back to your own bed.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Morning!
        she has bunches of different varieties–even the same as we use as home…but it’s not the same as when hubby brews it! I love his coffee!! this might be stronger than I’m used to…daughter and son both have keurigs…I drink tea at their places…

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Everyone develops a taste in these things – part of it is probably my sinus issue, plus I am not a coffee connoisseur – can’t tell the difference from one brand to the other. I never do regular coffee in my mini-Keurig – just certain flavors for a treat now and then. Plus, I drink almost as much creamer as coffee! LOL

          Liked by 1 person

  4. from tcth

    lindak
    October 16, 2022 12:30 am

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/15/alaska-republicans-call-on-kentucky-gop-to-censure-mitch-mcconnell-over-party-interference/

    Republicans in Alaska ask the Kentucky Republican Party to censure Mitch McConnell for interferring with their Republican candidate. Mc Connell is trying to help Lisa Murkowski with ads and money against Alaska’s Republican choice.
    Mitch has been crooked for so long he can’t see straight.He is caught in an obvious blunder.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Liked by 2 people

  6. Liked by 1 person

  12. Liked by 1 person

  13. Liked by 2 people

  16. let’s see if NARA will turn over documents…LOL
    Jordan and Comer want NARA to produce records/communications to see if NARA colluded with committee dems…
    FTA
    The two Republicans demanded access to NARA documents that would help them determine “whether and to what extent Congressional Democrats influenced and coordinated” with the National Archives to prompt the probe, which led to the unprecedented FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

    Among the evidence being sought are “all documents and communications between or among employees or agents of NARA and DOJ referring or relating to the Trump Administration’s control, transfer, storage, or other handling of documents subject to the Presidential Records Act.”

    The two men are in line to become their respective committees’ chairmen should Republicans win control of the House in next month’s midterm elections.

    Jordan (Ohio) and Comer (Ky.) cited a sequence of events in February in which Democrat House Oversight Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney wrote NARA inquiring whether it had talked to Attorney General Merrick Garland about 15 boxes of presidential records stored at Mar-a-Lago. “The same day — February 9, 2022 — a referral from NARA was sent to the United States Department of Justice that initiated an investigation into the former president,” the lawmakers noted.

    Republicans noted the sequence “raises serious concerns about whether NARA made the referral after pressure from Committee Democrats.”

    Republicans have been concerned about the relations between Democrats and NARA since learning of private briefings the agency gave majority staff earlier this year that excluded GOP members and their aides.

    https://justthenews.com/government/congress/house-gop-opens-probe-whether-national-archives-conspired-democrats-trump?utm_source=offthepress&utm_medium=home

    Liked by 1 person

  17. I didn’t know is NOT an excuse! diversity hires still need to KNOW the LAWS!!!
    FTA
    One year after the Fed was rocked by a trading scandal which cost the jobs of three Fed henchmen, including Dallas and Boston Fed presidents, Kaplan and Rosengren, and Fed vice-chair Richard Clarida (who couldn’t wait to be sacked for cause or otherwise just to get back to Pimco) after financial disclosures showed they had been trading extensively in individual stocks in 2020 during a period in which the Fed engaged in extraordinary market interventions as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, moments ago Atlanta Fed president Raphael Bostic joined the club of inglorious Fed traders when he revealed he had improperly disclosed financial transactions for the past five years because he incorrectly interpreted policies governing personal investments.

    As the WSJ reports, according to amended disclosures filed Friday, dozens of sales or purchases of mutual funds and other investment vehicles by Bostic hadn’t previously been disclosed. Adding insult to injury, more than 150 of those transactions had settled on dates when they weren’t allowed because they were during blackout periods before and after Fed policy meetings. And the cherry on top: last year Bostic also held more than $50,000 in Treasury securities, exceeding the then-permitted limit on such holdings for Fed officials.

    In other words, the first black and openly gay president of the Atlanta Fed was violating pretty much every rule in the book. His excuse? It was “inadvertent.”

    Bostic said the lapses were due to his flawed interpretation of central bank policies. He said he had sought to correct his filings and overhaul how he manages his personal accounts “as soon as I became aware that my financial reporting did not meet the expressed or implicit expectations necessary to maintain the public’s trust.”

    https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/atlanta-fed-president-reveals-five-years-trading-violations-claims-he-didnt-understand

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Liked by 1 person

  19. gees louise…sportswear contains BPA in amounts above accepted levels–BPA disrupts hormone function…
    FTA
    Sports bras and athletic shirts made by some of the major global sports brands were found to contain dangerous levels of the estrogen-mimicking chemical bisphenol A, commonly known as BPA, posing a considerable risk to people’s health, according to legal notices sent by the Center for Environmental Health (CEH).

    BPA—an endocrine disrupting chemical that upsets the body’s functioning through blocking or mimicking hormones—is linked to developmental and health problems mostly for young children. For adults, studies have found that high levels of the chemical results in heart problems, while experts have connected BPA to obesity, diabetes, ADHD, and other ailments, with more research pending for definitive conclusions.

    The CEH has sent legal notices to Athleta, PINK, Asics, The North Face, Brooks, All in Motion, Nike, and FILA regarding sports bras, and The North Face, Brooks, Mizuno, Athleta, New Balance, and Reebok for its activewear shirt collection. Testing conducted on branded clothing showed that individual wearers were exposed to 22 times the safe limit as permitted under California law.

    “Studies have shown that BPA can be absorbed through skin and end up in the bloodstream after handling receipt paper for seconds or a few minutes at a time. Sports bras and athletic shirts are worn for hours at a time, and you are meant to sweat in them, so it is concerning to be finding such high levels of BPA in our clothing,” said Kaya Allan Sugerman, director of the Illegal Toxic Threats Program at CEH.

    Investigations by the agency have discovered BPA in polyester-based clothing with spandex, including socks made for infants.

    “Even low levels of exposure during pregnancy have been associated with a variety of health problems in offspring,” said Dr. Jimena Diaz Leiva, science director at CEH, in the press release. The resultant abnormal developmental growth can increase the likelihood of “developing breast or ovarian cancer later in life.”

    The Epoch Times reached out to Nike, Fila, New Balance, Reebok, The North Face, Mizuno, and Asics for comment. Athleta, Pink, Brooks, and All in Motion could not be reached.

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/popular-athletic-clothing-brands-have-high-levels-of-hormone-disrupting-chemical-bpa-watchdog-group_4796318.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily

    Liked by 1 person

  20. nothing we didn’t expect…”impossible burgers” are not a healthy option…too many gmo’s to be considered healthy. but now in a study on rats, they create issues with kidneys and weight gain
    FTA
    (NaturalHealth365) There is a common misconception that all vegan and vegetarian food products are nutritious. Listen to the mainstream media, and you’ll hear about how vegan fare is a net positive for human health and the environment. For example, Impossible and Beyond faux burgers have become quite popular in recent years, especially among tweens, teens, and twenty-somethings concerned with health and ecological sustainability.

    Cut to the truth of the matter, and you will find Impossible faux burgers are anything but healthy. Read through the list of ingredients of Impossible veggie burgers and other processed vegan food products, and you’ll find they contain a plethora of chemicals, GMO ingredient, and unhealthy additives. A recent study revealed that Impossible Burger contains an ingredient likely to cause weight gain along with kidney disease and other health problems.
    Why you should think twice before eating an Impossible Burger

    Impossible Burgers, Beyond Burgers, and other faux meat options are marketed as healthy alternatives to animal flesh that supposedly benefit the environment and the greater good. Though vegan alternatives certainly have their merits, there are also some important drawbacks. Impossible Foods recently conducted an analysis of rats after consuming Impossible faux burgers. The study results were fairly surprising, especially from the perspective of Impossible executives, who likely assumed their products would have minimal or no impact on rats.

    The Impossible Foods’ rat study reveals the main ingredient within the faux burgers, soy leghemoglobin, spurred the onset of inexplicable alterations within rat biology. Impossible Foods’ soy leghemoglobin is genetically engineered rather than natural. It is possible the genetic alteration of the soy is the underlying cause of the changes in rats’ weight and even alterations to blood composition that cause kidney disease, inflammation, and possibly worse. The study even revealed that soy leghemoglobin has the potential to trigger anemia.
    Why soy leghemoglobin (SLH) is detrimental to human health

    The GMO ingredient, soy leghemoglobin, is created from yeast. However, the yeast used for soy leghemoglobin is also genetically modified. In summary, Impossible Foods’ faux burgers contain a genetically altered variation of soy stemming from yeast that food scientists within laboratories have also altered. The resulting “Frankenburger” appears to be anything but healthy.

    Though the weight and blood composition changes identified in rats after consuming the Impossible Burger are not guaranteed to occur in humans after consuming the same food products, the study results are concerning. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows Impossible to sell its chemical-laden and genetically modified products throughout the country. Impossible’s brass obtained governmental permission to market the faux hamburger in the United Kingdom and the European Union after requesting clearance in 2019.

    https://www.naturalhealth365.com/gmo-ingredient-in-impossible-burger-linked-to-weight-gain-kidney-disease.html

    Liked by 1 person

  21. almost forgot…when we went grocery shopping yesterday, I checked out the prices of turkey breasts–they didn’t have turkeys out…2 weeks ago they were only a few breasts available at $2.48/pound–up 20 cents a pound from 2 weeks prior.
    yesterday they were $2.68/pound and there were a LOT of breasts available…but still no turkeys out.
    when we go in 2 weeks, I will check the prices again.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. IDK if you would want to watch Russell Brand but I’ll drop the link – up to you. He is being forced to self-censor on YT (1 strike away from a weeks suspension, 1 more and his gone permanently), so he has a Rumble channel, where there is no censorship. I have to replay a lot because of his accent – LOL! I haven’t watched it yet but it’s only just over 2 minutes.

    https://rumble.com/v1lw5ve-russel-brand-says-youtube-censored-him-while-ignoring-all-of-the-corporate-.html

    Liked by 1 person

  28. EXCERPT: “A lawsuit alleging the U.S. government censored the opinions of the scientists who wrote the “Great Barrington Declaration” illustrates the First Amendment’s “chief purpose, and why the framers of the Constitution did not create an exception for ‘misinformation,” according to Jenin Younes, litigation counsel for the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), which is representing the scientists.

    Writing last month for Tablet — an online magazine of Jewish news, ideas and culture — Younes said censorship of “wrongthink” by Big Tech at the behest of the government is government censorship that violates the First Amendment.

    According to Younes, in October 2020, three “impeccably credentialed epidemiologists” — Jayanta Bhattacharya, professor of medicine at Standford, Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard and Sunetra Gupta, a professor of epidemiology at Oxford in the U.K. — gathered to publicly summarize their critical views of the emerging COVID-19 government-mandated restrictions.

    Younes said the three experts, after conducting their own research, wrote that lockdowns create more harm than good, and that resources should be devoted to protecting the vulnerable rather than shutting down society. They named their statement after Great Barrington, Massachusetts, the town where they gathered.

    But their declaration — and its call for a robust public scientific debate on the appropriate governmental responses to COVID-19 — was thwarted by U.S. government censorship. “Doctors Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins, enamored of newfound fame and basking in self-righteousness, took it upon themselves to suppress debate about the most important subject of the day,” Younes said.

    While federal district courts recently dismissed similar cases on the grounds that the plaintiffs could not prove state action, Younes said the judge in the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit “reached a different conclusion” and determined “there was enough evidence in the record to infer that the government was involved in social media censorship,” thus “granting the plaintiffs’ request for discovery at the preliminary injunction stage.”

    Documents obtained so far, along with others obtained via a related case and a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by America First Legal, have exposed the extent of the administration’s appropriation of Big Tech to create “a vast and unprecedented regime of viewpoint-based censorship on the information that most Americans see, hear and otherwise consume,” Younes said.”

    More: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/governments-censorship-first-amendment/

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Entire Article @ Brownstone Institute:

    “PayPal appears unsure whether it should participate in the current crusade against online “disinformation” or not.

    First it closed the PayPal accounts of The Daily Sceptic and the Free Speech Union, and even the personal account of their founder Toby Young, and then, two weeks later, it restored them. Then it announced that it would be docking $2,500 from anyone who uses its services in connection with “promoting misinformation” and then, two days later, it again reversed course and announced that this language was never intended to be included in its new Acceptable Use Policy (AUP).

    It was not intended to be included? Well, where did it come from then?

    Could the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation and its Digital Services Act (DSA), about which I wrote in my last Brownstone article, have something to do with PayPal’s skittish forays into “combatting disinformation?” Well, yes, they could, and you may rest assured that EU officials or representatives have already had a word with PayPal about them.

    As discussed in my previous article, the Code requires signatories to censor what is deemed by the European Commission to be disinformation on pain of massive fines. The enforcement mechanism, i.e. the fines, has been established under the DSA.

    PayPal is not, for the moment, a signatory of the Code. Furthermore, since it is neither a content platform nor a search engine – the potential channels of “disinformation” targeted in the DSA – it is obviously not in a position to censor per se. But the very first commitment in the “strengthened” Code of Practice unveiled by the European Commission last June is dedicated precisely to demonetization.

    Unsurprisingly, given the nature of the business models of the most prominent signatories – Twitter, Meta/Facebook and Google/YouTube – this commitment and the six “measures” it comprises are mostly related to advertising practices. But the “Guidance” that the Commission issued in May 2021, prior to the Code’s drafting, explicitly calls for “broadening” efforts to defund alleged purveyors of disinformation and contains the following highly pertinent recommendation:

    Actions to defund disinformation should be broadened by the participation of players active in the online monetisation value chain, such as online e-payment services, e-commerce platforms and relevant crowd-funding/donation systems. (p. 8; emphasis added)

    PayPal, the online e-payment service par excellence, was thus already in the Commission’s sights. Somewhat illogically, given their own emphasis on advertising and the fact that an advertising-based revenue model and a donation or pay model would ordinarily be regarded as alternatives, the signatories of the “strengthened” Code thus pledged to

    ‘…exchange best practices and strengthen cooperation with relevant players, expanding to organisations active in the online monetisation value chain, such as online e-payment services, e-commerce platforms and relevant crowd-funding/donation systems…. (Commitment 3)’

    But the outreach to PayPal has not only occurred via third parties like the Code signatories. In late May, shortly after the text of the Digital Services Act had been finalized – but before the European Parliament had even had the opportunity to vote on it! – an 8-member delegation from the parliament was dispatched to California to discuss the DSA and the related Digital Markets Act (DMA) with relevant “digital stakeholders.”

    In addition to Code signatories Google and Meta, the “host list,” so to say – since the parliamentarians were to be the guests and they were inviting themselves! – also included PayPal. (See the delegation report here.)

    Curiously, Twitter was not included among the companies and organizations to be visited, perhaps because of the turmoil unleashed by Elon Musk’s takeover bid. But, as touched upon in my prior article, Thierry Breton, the EU’s Internal Market Commissioner, had already paid a visit to Musk in Austin, Texas earlier in the month to have a word with him about the DSA.

    No less than three of the delegation’s eight members – Alexandra Geese, Marion Walsmann and delegation head Andreas Schwab – were German, whereas Germans only account for around 13% of the total members of the parliament. This stark overrepresentation is telling, since Germany has undoubtedly been the prime mover behind the EU’s censorship drive, having already adopted its own online censorship law in 2017 with the express motivation of “combatting criminal fake news in social networks” (p. 1 of the legislative proposal in German here).

    The German legislation, commonly known as “NetzDG” or the Network Enforcement Act, threatens platforms with fines of up to €50 million for hosting content that infringes any of a variety of German laws that restrict speech in ways that would be unthinkable and unconstitutional in the United States. It is also the source of the Twitter notices that many Twitter users will have received informing them that their account had been denounced by “a person from Germany.”

    As noted above, PayPal is not presently a signatory of the Code of Practice on Disinformation. On July 14, however, just nine days after the passage of the DSA, the Commission issued a “Call for interest to become a Signatory” of the Code. The call is explicitly addressed to, among others, “e-payment services, e-commerce platforms, crowd-funding/donation systems.” The latter are identified as “providers whose services may be used to monetize disinformation.”

    Evidently not satisfied merely with “deplatforming,” the Commission has thus made clear that the next frontier in its combat against “disinformation” is attempting to defund dissenters who, despite their discrimination by or banishment from the major online platforms, have managed to preserve a place in the online discussion thanks to platforms of their own.

    PayPal, moreover, will know that the “exclusive” – in effect, dictatorial – powers that the DSA confers on the European Commission include the power to designate the “very large” online platforms that are susceptible to incurring the massive DSA fines of up to 6% of global turnover. PayPal will easily satisfy the “very large” size criterion of having at least 45 million users in the EU, but it is obviously not a content platform.

    Nonetheless, this appears not to be so obvious to the European Commission. For the Commission press release on the call for signatories treats it precisely…as a content platform! Thus, the press release refers to “providers of e-payment services, e-commerce platforms, crowd-funding/donation systems, which may be used to spread disinformation.” Huh?

    In the meanwhile, on September 1, the EU has opened a specially-dedicated office or “embassy” in San Francisco to conduct what it itself describes as “digital diplomacy” with US tech firms. The “ambassador,” Commission official Gerard de Graaf, is reportedly one of the drafters of the DSA. Perhaps he will be able to explain the intricacies of the DSA to PayPal – or even already has. PayPal headquarters are, after all, just a stone’s throw away in Palo Alto.

    In any case, PayPal has been put on notice, and, with it, so too have dissident websites that depend on user support for their survival. Ignore the EU at your peril.”

    Liked by 1 person

  30. without internet, we watched mostly early early news in the morning–local–and saw little of the headlines. i caught a glimpse of the 1/6 committee subpoenaing REALPOTUS for documents (doesn’t the fib/doj already have them all?) and an appearance…what do you all think of that???

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It’s a ploy – been talking about at M’s for some time. He wants to appear but supposedly he wants it to be on live TV, I think. Not surprising, really – I think most of us expected it.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. they won’t put him on live tv unless they could sensor and time delay it…
        they’ll cut off his mike whenever he starts saying something they don’t want out there

        Liked by 1 person

  31. Well, I decided I needed to take some breaks and get back to reading more. So I went to the library and saw that one of my long-time favs had a new book out – Julie Garwood – but as I’m reading it, now I can see how shallow and superficial it is, with no depth and the typical macho guys trying to “take care” of their women! I can’t read that stuff any more! Trivial, mindless pablum to me now. I doubt I’ll even finish it. On to the Faye Kellerman book….we’ll see how that goes. Looks like I need to find some new authors!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. that happened with one of the authors I liked so much! (different genre tho–cozy mysteries)
      her wrongly accused/innocent character ALWAYS seem to touch the murder weapon they just happened to find (in the VICTIM)…so stupid…these days erbody knows not to touch that! sigh…stopped reading right there

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Garwood has a series of books about members of the same 3 families. But here’s the thing – ALL of them are rich, have huge glamorous homes, travel the world, own their own island near Boston, employed as lawyers, FBI, police, Navy Seals, judges, etc. No-one is ever poor!!!! Tired of it.

        Liked by 1 person

  32. Entire Article @ Brownstone:

    Repeat after me: New York City’s emergency rooms were not overwhelmed by visits in spring 2020. In fact, they were busier during the 2017-2018 flu season than they were at any point between lockdown orders and January 2022’s “omicron surge.”

    Data from the New York City Department of Health & Hygiene, provided via FOIA request, tell a different story from the one told by elected officials, news media, dancing nurses, and aspiring celebrity doctors.

    Contrary to The Narrative, Governor Cuomo’s stay-home orders didn’t come “just in time” to save NYC’s healthcare system from collapse. They triggered a staggering 60%+ decline in the number of people coming or being brought to ERs. (NYC’s spring 2020 emergency visit decline was even greater than Chicago’s.) That’s a hard truth to handle given the city’s record high number of EMS calls and hospital, outpatient facility, and ER deaths in spring 2020.

    It’s likewise a hard, if predictable, truth to handle for those of us who were/are anti-lockdown.

    – We remember how selected images of and video from NYC hospitals scaring people across the country about how dangerous covid must be.

    – We remember being told, implicitly if not explicitly, that in order to avoid what was happening in New York, we must be content with Zoom church, screen school, carryout, and minimal in-person contact with humans outside our own household.

    – We remember that anyone who questioned the wisdom of these directives – or wondered whether NYC hospitals were truly any busier than during a bad flu season – was a grandma killer. (Meanwhile, grandma was being killed by the very policies and protocols put in place to *save hospitals* and *slow the spread,* not only in the hospital and at the long-term care facility, but also at home.)

    No one denies that thousands of New Yorkers died needlessly in March – May 2020. Now we know it wasn’t because the city’s ERs were overrun.”

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Entire Article on Substack – Mark Oshinskie, Oct 12:

    “Many Americans suffer from anxiety disorders or have mind-bending insecurities. It’s sad. And broadly consequential.

    I heard that Steven Colbert had Tony Fauci on his show last week. Though I seldom watch TV, I wondered how either of these two individuals might now explain their prior promotion of injections that have not only failed but have been temporally linked to tens of thousands of serious injuries, deaths and declining fertility. So I viewed these cheesy twelve TV minutes on YouTube; at 2x speed, so as not to waste any more time than I had to.

    Mental illness was on full display. To begin, the plainly anxiety-ridden Colbert introduced Fauci as the government official “whose level-headed guidance took us through the Pandemic.”

    That’s funny. I didn’t need or want a government official to guide/attempt to coerce me through the past thirty months. The virus never scared me. Nor should it have scared any reasonably healthy person under 80 who had even a rough sense of the Covid risk data. Accordingly, I wanted the government to leave me, and others, alone; to allow us to assess our own risks and to take care of our own bodies.

    Colbert was projecting his anxiety on everyone else. Liberals, such as Colbert and his acolytes, are very likely to be anxious. They’re the vast majority of psychotherapy clients and psych med swallowers. It bothers liberals that others aren’t equally anxious. This perception amplifies liberals’ anxiety. Hence, anxiety squared.

    If I had been hosting, I would have described Fauci more accurately as “the career bureaucrat who grossly exaggerated the threat posed by a virus and repeatedly lied to a gullible public, thus causing deep, wide and lasting damage to America.”

    But of course, Fauci wouldn’t have agreed to appear on my show. Despite his “I am the Science” nonsense, he’s too insecure to face questions from anyone who’s done even a little research and thinking about the virus, its effects and the reaction to it. Someone secure in his beliefs, armed with solid data and devoted to the scientific method would welcome, not shrink from, dialogue and debate. Fauci is the consummate shrinker.

    Disturbingly but unsurprisingly, Fauci got an enthusiastic ovation from the Colbert claque, every member of which, when shown on camera, appeared to be masked. This audience was clearly a politically skewed, non-representative sample. In October, 2022, a random sample of Americans would contain many who would not only reject masks and boosters but also boo and heckle Fauci for his repeated failures and lies over the past two and a half years.

    At this stage, given all the vaxx failure and Fauci’s firm, but quickly disproven guarantee that those who jabbed wouldn’t get sick or spread the virus, those who still support the shots and wear masks after injecting reveal deficits of knowledge, poor judgment, and/or mental illness. Colbert’s, and others, enduring love of Fauci and of the jabs isn’t remotely rational. Thus, neither the pathologically anxious, non-old vaxxer/maskers nor their Dear Leaders have any residual credibility.

    Colbert followed his fawning intro with a few slowball questions, to which Fauci gave silly or inaccurate answers. Colbert didn’t ask Fauci to show how any of Fauci’s Covid interventions did any good. Nor did Colbert ask Fauci to either admit or deny that those measures caused vast, lasting harm. Colbert also declined to give Fauci a chance to concede that he was wrong when he assured Americans that the shots would stop viral infection and spread; more specifically, Colbert never asked Fauci why both of them—and millions of others—have gotten sick after injecting. Colbert did ask if the shots injured people. Fauci summarily and disingenuously dismissed this very real concern.

    Colbert didn’t apologize for his extremely dorky “Vaccine Dance” video, which proselytized for an extremely ineffective, harmful product that will soon be the subject of massive lawsuits. Why shouldn’t Colbert and his network be canceled and held liable for the vaxx injuries that followed their benighted evangelization? In addition to this week’s disclosure of a document revealing CDC/HHS efforts to conscript or pay entertainers to promote vaxxes and to mock jab decliners, TV networks have profited from selling ad time to enable the government and Pharma to hype these unprotective, injurious shots. The courts should disincentivize such reckless messaging and instead, shift resources to those damaged by their reliance on such false content. These are fundamental tort law tenets.

    These few minutes of Colbert’s obsequious treatment of a bumbling, yet somehow cocky, bureaucrat left his delusional studio audience and at-home devotees feeling well-informed. Thusly misled, the Team Colbert likely felt empowered to post more Tweets haughtily disparaging those who were smart enough not to waste time standing in line for tickets or stay up late to watch such propaganda. More importantly, Colbert detractors were smart enough to not inject in the first place.

    Fauci shilled for the latest booster, glibly lying about the prior shots’ effectiveness in preventing hospitalization and death and cluelessly saying that yet another shot would enable a “return to normality.” Except for those with anxiety disorders, most of the rest of us returned to normality months, or years, ago. At this point, it’s laughable for Fauci to suggest that he can implicitly threaten non-vaxxers with house arrest or bar their access to public places for refusing to do more of what has already, repeatedly failed. He’s an oblivious demagogue.

    Unfortunately, Fauci’s and Colbert’s initial vaxx hype ran smack into legions of real-life examples of illness and death in vaxxed people that everyone knew, or themselves became. Of the people I know, the vaxxed were multi-fold more likely to get sick than were the uninjected. As the shots failed to provide the immunity they were guaranteed to provide, and as many people know people who’ve been injured by the shots, rational people will decline to boost up. Passive old people and those who lack the courage to defy college, workplace or other vaxx mandates will comprise the vast majority of those who take the next—fifth?—round of shots. Most others will forgo the free beer or doughnuts. Or will the prizes be upgraded this time? How about beer and doughnuts? Plus a lotto scratch-off. Yeah, that’s the ticket.

    After breaking for commercials—which YT didn’t show but were statistically likely to include Pharma and/or vaxx promotion—the blithely ignorant talk show host and his chirpy guest joked as they strolled down the midtown Manhattan sidewalk to a pharmacy to get reinjected. Steve and Tony: we’re laughing at you, not with you.

    Unsurprisingly, there was no one in queue for the shots. Remember the heady days of early 2021, when some people wanted to jump the jab priority line? Remember “two shots and this is all over?” Remember one-way supermarket aisles? Much space would be required to list all the lies you should remember.

    In the YT comments to the above-described video, I noted the foregoing lies. Unsurprisingly, YT’s “liberals” censored my message. The truth hurts.

    So I’ll say it again here: Fauci has built a Scamdemic record replete with failure. None of the measures he prescribed and supported: lockdowns, school closures, mask mandates or mass scale 40 cycle PCR testing or shots has worked. Each has caused deep human and economic damage. Given such profound and pervasive failure, it’s ludicrous that Fauci thinks most people still value his opinion.

    Despite all of the money he’s made in the public sector, Fauci’s life must have been hard. It’s never been easy to be a male of well below average height. It’s probably not a coincidence that some of the most destructive despots in history: Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Putin, Franco, Kim Jong-il, Duvalier, Marcos, J. Edgar Hoover, et al., have been short men.

    Based on my reading of RFK Jr’s book, The Real Anthony Fauci, and Fauci’s conduct during the past thirty months, it’s my opinion that, just as Colbert’s anxiety caused him to support the failed Covid interventions, Fauci’s insecurity about his height has caused him to bureaucratically bully many throughout his career. By foolishly giving Fauci an audience, Trump enabled the vertically-challenged Fauci to pull the same compensatory power trip on the American public that Fauci had previously pulled on work colleagues and NIAID grant applicants. And/or Fauci’s corrupt. Because “The Science” has never supported his Scamdemic pronouncements or policies.

    Life is hard. Everyone I know bears some burden or other. Most do so with equanimity and dignity, and without victimizing others. It’s been deeply wrong—and extremely selfish—for Colbert, Fauci and their groupies to have externalized their mental unwellness on hundreds of millions of others by insisting on society-wide, lastingly destructive Coronavirus interventions.”

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Entire Article @ Brownstone: “There are a few people who talk up ‘populism’ as something good, such as Steve Hilton at Fox News. Many others condemn ‘populism,’ including some classical liberals. A lot of the ‘populism’ talk does not sit well with me.

    What is populism? I will consider several meanings and ask whether ‘populism’ is apt. But first, some preliminary reflections on word usage and meaning.

    Political discourse abounds with waywardness in word usage. It’s something you do not want to fall into. Falling into it has two sides, passive and active. The passive vice is going along with the wayward word usage in the discourse you read or listen to. The active vice is discoursing waywardly yourself. Try to be neither sap nor perp of word waywardness. [NF: Passive would be everyone using the word “democracy,” ala Tucker and almost everyone else!]

    To resist falling into word waywardness, we need semantic scruples, and that calls for recognizing polysemy—poly in signification. That is, the word has multiple meanings. Expect political words to be polysemous.

    The multiple meanings of the word will be contested. First, there is the contestation of what meanings should be on the list. Second, there is the contestation over the ordering of the meanings on the list; that is, over the relative properness or worthiness of the meanings on the list.

    In fact—and stepping back a moment—note that, for any given word, you should maintain two sorts of lists, passive and active. My passive list aids me, as listener or reader, in attributing meaning to the speaker or writer of the word, and my active list guides me in how I shall use the word in my own speaking and writing. For a word of central importance, our active list should be shorter than our passive list, because there should be meanings for which others employ the word that we consider the usage inapt. Indeed, we might feel that there is no meaning worth signifying with a given word—‘neoliberal,’ anyone?, ‘social justice,’ anyone? That is, our active list of worthy meanings for the expression might have zero items on it—in which case we exclude the word from our active vocabulary.

    And let me step back yet again: I speak of a list for a word of its meanings. You may think of it as a list of connotations. Meaning suggests a determinate meaning for the word in each usage, whereas connotation suggests one among many, a set of connotations (or associations) which give fuzzy, complex meaning to whatever it is that the speaker intends to signify by the word.

    OK, now, to ‘populism.’

    I feel that a lot of ‘populism’ talk is wayward, both among those who are pro-‘populism’ and those who are anti-‘populism.’ To explain why, I develop a passive list of meanings or connotations. What do users of the word populism mean by it?

    1. Social movements or political parties that brand themselves ‘populist,’ such as in the United States in the late nineteenth-century with the People’s or Populist Party, which got behind William Jennings Bryan as the Democratic presidential candidate in 1896. Today, when people refer to a party or movement as ‘populist,’ such as the Republican Party in the United States or the Sweden Democrats in Sweden, the party in question does not brand itself ‘populist.’ It is true that sometimes some of its proponents describe themselves or the movement as ‘populist,’ but other adjectives used by many other proponents are also used, most notably ‘conservative.’ For the points that follow, I suppose that the signified parties or movements do not brand themselves as ‘populist,’ even if some of their proponents sometimes use ‘populist.’

    2. Opposition to ‘elites,’ to ‘the permanent political class,’ to ‘the swamp,’ to the administrative state and its network of allies: About this meaning of ‘populist’ I have two things to say. The first is directed especially toward those who are pro-‘populism:’ If this meaning is foremost, there is a paradox because the movement aims to win political power and leadership, in which case either: (A) its members would, to the extent that they were successful, slay the dragon and subvert the basis for thinking themselves populist; or (B) they would themselves become the elites, in which case a refreshed populism might oppose them. My second point is directed toward those who are anti-‘populist:’ There is a lot to be said for opposing the administrative state and its network of allied institutions and political organizations—though I wouldn’t call that opposition ‘populism.’ I once wrote a paper about why government officials believe in the goodness of bad policy—here it is, and here is a slide-deck with a link to a video about the paper. The swamp is swampy. I’m reluctant to use ‘populist’ to mean ‘opposed to swampiness.’

    3. National sovereignty, particularly as opposed to certain transnational institutions, often of governance, media, or finance: Again, I don’t see why this should be called ‘populism.’ As for whether national sovereignty is good or bad, it’s a question of the particular comparison. But given that many transnational institutions of governance and media leave so much to be desired, an emphasis on more local sovereignty seems aligned with the ‘little platoons’ of classical-liberal epistemic-humility teachings on accountability, federalism, subsidiarity, and the cultivation of virtue in local or ‘bottom-up’ family, community, and institutions.

    4. Patriotism or local or national tradition and custom, particularly as opposed either to the values imputed to certain elites or transnational institutions or to what is thought of as undue value pluralism: Again, I don’t see why this should be called ‘populism.’ As for whether patriotism and an emphasis on national tradition and custom is good or bad, it is a question of the particular comparison. A classical liberal like myself might favor the ‘populist’ (for example, on much woke lunacy or in a contention over one of the extremes on abortion), might favor the side that the ‘populist’ opposes (for example, in a contention over the other extreme on abortion), and sometimes neither.

    5. “Popular” government in the sense of more democracy; that is, widening the electorate, widening the issues and choices that the electorate votes on, making the electorate more directly determinative of outcomes, and so on: In this case, ‘populism’ is something more of the political left than the non-left.

    6. Bad in politics: This is analogous to the word waywardness we witness when reading adversaries of ‘neoliberalism’—and, inversely, when reading those who use ‘democratic’ to mean good. A lot of classical liberals are using ‘populist’ in a fuzzy, untenable, wayward way, and it seems, in effect, to mean politically bad or as a codeword for certain political baddies. The test to put to them is two-fold: First, ask, “What do you mean by ‘populist’?” Let us suppose that they answer that question, and in a way that does not effectively reduce ‘populist’ to politically bad. Then ask: “OK, so you distinguish between bad political parties or movements that are populist and those that are not populist. Tell me which baddies you do not count as ‘populist’ and let’s test to see whether your definition really excludes them from ‘populism’ as you claim to understand it.”

    My personal policy is not to admit a word into my active vocabulary if, for any signification I might give it, I see a better word. I exclude ‘populism’ from my active vocabulary, except narrowly in sense (1) above, because for meanings (2) through (6) there are better words to use.

    Sometimes a word remains outside a person’s active vocabulary because she lacks the competence to include it, and sometimes because she has the competence to exclude it.”

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Entire Article @ Brownstone: “This is the question that seems to be on the minds of many these days.

    The attempt to reach “zero-COVID” was a colossal failure. Original claims of mRNA vaccine efficacy have reportedly been shown to be based on falsified data. Excess mortality is spiking across the globe. And the Canadian government finally admits they have a multi-million dollar contract (pdf) with the World Economic Forum for Traveler Digital ID. What was fiction and then conspiracy theory is now reality.

    Many believe we are approaching a tipping point, that we are on the verge of a revelatory storm, that the truth is finally coming out.

    And yet most people still believe in the narrative, still cling to the idea that lockdowns and masking were necessary and effective, that their questioning friends are unstable “anti-vaxxers,” that government is noble and mainstream media unimpeachable. And from the files of the truly unfathomable, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) is now urging doctors to prescribe drugs and even psychotherapy to their noncompliant patients. The tipping point is hardly a sure thing.

    What if we never reach it? What if the guilty are never held to account? What if we forget only to transgress again and again? Anecdotes of the harms of the last two years are palpable but ignored. Patients complain of symptoms their doctors won’t acknowledge. Citizens tell stories the media ignores. Family members try to open dialogue only to be shut down. The stories are told but, for the most part, they aren’t being heard.

    I recently interviewed Trish Wood, who moderated the Citizens’ Hearing about the harms of our public health response to COVID-19. She wrote that, a week later, she still felt shaken by the magnitude of what she heard: the damage done to careers, families, and children by the blinkered approach of public health experts. She heard the stories of doctors who were silenced when trying to advocate for patients, people whose lives were forever changed by vaccine injury, and, most tragically, stories of those like Dan Hartman, whose teenage son died following mRNA vaccination.

    Trish wrote powerfully about the importance of taking account of embedding the acknowledgment of these harms in our collective moral conscience. Her words are, dare I say, reminiscent of Elie Wiesel’s.

    In the aftermath of the Holocaust, at a time when the world was so morally injured, so eager for a new start, Auschwitz survivor Elie Wiesel saw it as his responsibility to speak for those who had been silenced. At a time when most could not bear to remember, Wiesel could not bear to forget. He wrote:

    “I believe firmly and profoundly that whoever listens to a witness becomes a witness, so those who hear us, those who read us must continue to bear witness for us. Until now, they’re doing it with us. At a certain point in time, they will do it for all of us.”

    Weisel’s words are hauntingly poignant for our time.

    Those who tell the stories of the injured knowing they will be ignored, who advocate for patients only to be censured, who highlight the children who have died by suicide rather than from COVID-19 only to be silenced do it because they believe that a cry in the dark will eventually be heard. And even if it isn’t, they feel obligated to testify on behalf of those who can’t speak for themselves.

    I apologize if my reference to Nazi atrocities offends you. My aim in making the comparison is not to be irreverent but purposeful. True, the atrocities of our time are not identical to those of 1930s and ’40s Europe. But they don’t need to be to learn important moral lessons from them. Wiesel’s promise of “never again” was not just to past victims of atrocities but to all future victims as well.

    This is how the battle will be fought now, whether the truth about the last two years will be dragged into the open or revised into oblivion. We are already seeing backpedaling among our officials, whose mishandling of the pandemic is undeniable.

    But that is beyond my point. We have relied for too long on institutions to do the remembering for us, to generate moral responsibility on our behalf. In the era of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, personal accountability has been trained out of us. We were taught to believe that institutions would act as our surrogate moral conscience, taking account and making apology for us. I don’t deny the importance of collective responsibility. But sometimes moral injury is personal, done by individuals to one another, and the accountability needs to happen in kind.

    There are few who are not personally complicit in the harms of the last two years. And the temptation to put on the armor of the bystander is powerful, to say we weren’t involved, that we “had no choice.” But complicity is a form of moral action, sometimes the most powerful there is.

    Wouldn’t it be lovely if our moral slate could be wiped clean, if we could be absolved of all the hurt we have caused? But this doesn’t honor the truth, and it’s not the way we exercise our humanity.

    What if the truth never comes out? It may not.

    But if it doesn’t, it shouldn’t be because we ignored those crying out to us, because we stood behind a shield of compliance and deference. The road back to freedom, unity, and reconciliation starts with testimony and accountability, and we need to take those painful first few steps now.”

    Liked by 1 person

  36. The entire video is almost 3 hours since it covers the entire debate. Starts off with a video of Scott Pressler explaining how to go about getting people to register to vote while they are waiting to get the debate going. This is an old presentation from Scott from before the 2020 election.

    #WalkAway’s Black American Culture War LIVE Debate.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. I haven’t seen anything recent since the one video where he said he was on bed rest. I’ve got the video playing in background and, if you like, I can tell you where the good parts are, like if Candace is there or really good exchanges.

        Liked by 1 person

  46. As I listen to this panel (WalkAway debate), the left simply refuses to move into the 21st century – they consistently refer back to the late 1800’s, early 1900’s, but will NOT acknowledge that we, as a country, have moved far beyond that. This is looking like a waste of time, IMO. No-one with a name I recognize.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. woman stabbed and beaten for wearing American flag t shirt in minnesota
    entire article
    A Minnesota woman was stabbed and savagely beaten by a man who police say attacked her for wearing an American flag t-shirt. Peter Paul Jal, who is still at-large, faced numerous felony charges.

    Officers arrived at an apartment complex in Mankato, Minnesota on October 2nd after receiving a call from a woman who was brutally attacked by Peter Paul Jal. Jal became enraged when he saw her wearing an American flag t-shirt.

    According to charging documents, the woman “was soaking wet head to toe in water,” when officers arrived on the scene and was “actively bleeding from the nose.” Furthermore, her “face was swollen to the point that officers couldn’t see her eyes, and her nose was swollen.”

    The woman told police that “she was assaulted by Paul Peter Jal,” who became “upset” because “she was wearing an American flag shirt.” So “Jal attacked her.”

    After trying to choke her out, he delivered repeated blows to her body and face before ripping a towel rack out of a wall and stabbing her with it, telling her that she would “die” that night.

    After Jal destroyed the woman’s phone, another person on-scene, who is also listed as a victim of the attack, was able to call 911 and alert the authorities.

    23-year-old Peter Paul Jal, on whom limited information is available, has been charged in Blue Earth County Court with multiple felonies. While more charges could be to come, currently, Jal faces counts of 2nd-degree assault with a dangerous weapon, 3rd-degree assault – substantial bodily harm, and threats of violence.

    Despite the nature of his charges, there hasn’t been any talk from local authorities about charged Jal with a hate crime in the anti-American attack.

    According to the latest information available from the county justice system, Jal has yet to be arrested on the charges.

    In 2021, Jal was charged with fleeing police. Little information is available on his background, though social media comments indicate that he is of Somali or foreign Islamic origin.

    Minnesota has become the epicenter of America’s absorption of Somali and third-world Islamic migrants, a number of whom have gone on to be tied to ISIS, Al-Shabab, and other terror networks.

    As recently reported by National File, one school district in Burnsville, Minnesota, just outside of Ilahn Omar’s Minneapolis, has produced at least three Islamic terrorists in recent years. If local adults were added to that figure, it would be even higher.

    The same school district recently rolled out a Sharia-compliant “school spirit hijab” program for elementary schooler students under the guise of their “Somali cultural liaison.”

    https://nationalfile.com/minnesota-woman-stabbed-savagely-beaten-for-wearing-american-flag-t-shirt/

    Like

  48. they will claim that inner city folks are suffering from a lack of convenience stores…somehow they need reparations for that inconvenience…even tho they CREATED the inconvenience
    from tcth

    Troublemaker10
    October 16, 2022 12:43 pm

    Democrat policies will eventually turn cities into ghost towns.

    **********

    Wawa to close 2 Center City Philadelphia locations due to continued safety concerns

    https://6abc.com/wawa-closing-center-city-philadelphia-shutting-down-philly/12325220/

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.